Canada 2020 and the New Malthusian Takeover of
Canada
March 12, 2014
By Matthew
Ehret
Today, the Canadian political
landscape is being remolded by a group of British agents who seek to accomplish
an overhaul of the Liberal Party structure in line with the reform conducted 54
years ago with the British-run ouster of the “continentalist” liberals of C.D.
Howe and Prime Minister St. Laurent during the interim period of 1957-1963.
This 1957-1963 destruction of the
once pro-development spirit of the Liberal Party of Canada was replaced by a
Fabian Society/Rhodes Scholar-run instrument of technocratic fascism
culminating in the 1968-72 revolution in cybernetic affairs early on in the
mandate of Pierre Elliot Trudeau. This federal “Quiet Revolution” put a
complete halt to scientific and technological progress and ushered in the green
destruction of the pro-development orientation that had hitherto dominated top
down policy making and mass popular consciousness in Canada and replaced it
with a new oligarchical system of control in government based on Trudeau’s
commitment to Cybernetics and Systems Analysis. In fact, as Julian Huxley
outlined over 20 years earlier, Cybernetics and Systems Analysis-thinking would
be the tools selected to repackage “Eugenics” and “Malthusianism” under new
names.
Gordon’s
Thinkers Conference: 1960 Kingston
The original conference that brought
this new Liberal makeover scheme together was known as the Kingston “Thinkers”
Conference of 1960, led by agents of the Canadian Institute of International
Affairs (CIIA) Walter Gordon, Maurice Lamontagne, Lester B. Pearson, Lionel
Chevrier, Tom Kent, Keith Davey and other social engineers who were obsessed
with cleaning out the political landscape of all forces committed to scientific
and technological progress and continental cooperation with the pro-development
America of John F. Kennedy1.
Under the chairmanship of Gordon,
the participants of the “Thinkers” conference created the Committee to
Restructure the Liberal Party Organization which set itself to work to counter
the challenge the brilliant young President John F. Kennedy was launching
against the Anglo-Dutch oligarchy[2]. Under
Kennedy’s leadership, Canada was in danger of slipping away from the hands of
the oligarchy’s influence as a bold vision of new frontiers called forth the
pioneering spirit of Canadian citizens and policy-makers. Although the C.D.
Howe Liberals and Diefenbaker Conservatives differed in their methods, both
were fundamentally committed to achieving progress and increasing the
productive powers of the nation through scientific and technological progress.
Diefenbaker himself had attempted to found a new Canadian nationalism upon a
bold vision for Arctic development which represented a grave threat to the
oligarchy and had to be undermined at all cost.
In response to this danger, the
Liberal party was wiped clean of C.D. Howe Liberals in what Henry Erskine Kidd,
General Secretary for the Liberal Party, called “a palace revolution” run
directly by Walter Gordon, while Gordon himself led in the destruction of
Diefenbaker3. C.D. Howe himself, now nearing his
last days watched the Thinkers conference with sadness when he wrote: “I am
afraid that Mike [Pearson] is being advised by the wrong type of officers. The
meeting of the Thinkers Club certainly didn’t help him politically”[4].
On top of this, a new Fabian-inspired
centralized-socialist planning structure was adopted to provide social
incentives for Canadians to remain complacent and controlled, a new national
anthem and flag were adopted to promote the mythology that Canada had been
freed from its British mother to become a sovereign country, and a new
technocratic structure of bureaucracy and systems planning was adopted. The
blueprint that was designed to implement this reform was led by Gordon’s
partner at Clarkson-Gordon John Grant Glassco, who ran the Royal Commission on
Government Organization in 1962 and Gordon’s protégé Maurice Lamontagne, who
ran the Senate Commission on Science Policy from 1968-1972. Both Gordon and
Lamontagne served as Presidents of the Privy Council consecutively.
To understand this structural
overhaul which began to bring in a vast compartmentalized bureaucracy run by
technocratic social scientists and accountants, it is worth noting that this
1960 conference was itself modeled on a yet earlier precedent that had occurred
27 years prior named the Port Hope Conference under the guidance of Gordon’s
CIIA collaborator Vincent Massey. Both Gordon and Massey are credited as the
fathers of Canada’s post 1963 “New Nationalism”. Key founding blueprints for
this ‘New [anti-American] Nationalism’ were laid out in Gordon’s powerful Royal
Commission on Economic Prospects for Canada from 1955-1957 which followed
Massey’s 1949-1952 Royal Commission on National Development in the Arts,
Letters and Sciences.
Massey’s
Conference: 1933 Port Hope
The 1933 Port Hope conference was
sponsored by CIIA leader Vincent Massey. The danger for the Canadian-British
oligarchy represented by Massey even then was that pro-nationalist forces had
dominated the Liberal Party throughout the 1920s in the form of the “Laurier
Liberals” of O.D. Skelton, Chubby Power and Ernest Lapointe, all three of whom
exerted enormous influence on the leader of the Liberal Party, William Lyon
Mackenzie King, who became Prime Minister once again in 1935 after the party
had fallen from power in 1930.
Then serving as President of the
Liberal Party, Vincent Massey, a student of Lord Alfred Milner5, noted that the 1933 Conference marked the transformation
of the Liberal Party “from the laissez-faire traditions of the party to a
new, more technocratic and interventionist view of government”[6]. Just as would occur 27 years later in Kingston, the
challenge for the oligarchy involved 1) keeping Canada complacent by
encouraging a technocratic managerial class and 2) blocking greater cooperation
with an anti-Imperial America led by the great Franklin Delano Roosevelt. This
conference was designed to coincide with the 1933 London Economic Conference
that had brought together 66 nations to deal with the global depression by the
establishment of a globalized standard of balanced budgets, and currency
controls under the dictatorship of the Bank of England.
Fortunately in 1933, the power of
the oligarchy was thwarted as the London Economic Conference of 1933 was
sabotaged by Roosevelt who refused to attend and decided not to sacrifice
American sovereignty on the Wall Street altar of a globally extended banksters
dictatorship. It was FDR’s sabotage of this conference that put a final nail in
the coffin of the imperial League of Nations. Fabian Society eugenicist H.G.
Wells blamed the rise of global fascism on FDR’s nationalist sabotage of this
conference.
Canada
2020 and the Kingston Conference of the 21st Century
In the modern period, the 1933
Massey Port Hope Conference and 1960 Gordon Kingston Conference has taken the
form of a June 2006 conference in Mont Tremblant Quebec hosted by a London-run
think tank known as Canada 2020 and a pack of Rhodes Scholars.
The two day conference sponsored by
this new think tank was keynoted by none other than Al Gore, who was brought in
by high level members of the Queen’s elite Privy Council such as John Manley,
Bob Rae and Anne McLellan, in order to reform the policy structures of the
federal government, the Liberal Party and the Canadian culture itself after the
downfall of Paul Martin in February 2006.
The Liberal Party of Jean Chretien
and Paul Martin, which had been in power from 1993-2006, distinguished itself
as being the last major federal party to resist, even in some small form,
aspects of the Anglo-Dutch Empire’s global program in the form of their rejection
of Canada’s participation in the Iraq war and the failed 1997 attempt to
consolidate the “big 5” banks into the “big 3”. Battles between Chretien and
such pro-British establishment figures as Lord Conrad Black expressed this lack
of British control over its Canadian dominion to
a large degree. Such lack of control of an important dominion
within the British Commonwealth had to be reined in and a more virulent form of
Canadian nationalism more conducive to globally extended empire had to be
weaved in its place. Considering the very real possibility that Obama might
still be impeached and Glass-Steagall restored in the United States, bringing
America back towards its constitutional roots as outlined by American statesman
Lyndon LaRouche, the desire by the British oligarchy to keep a tight grip on
its North American colony in recent years has been
more desperate now during the economic collapse than ever before.
An important decision made during
the conference of 2006 was to groom a young Justin Trudeau to become the
spokesperson of the new liberal party. Prize assets of Power Corporation, the
World Wildlife Fund and the Canadian International Council (CIC)[7] were subsequently deployed to manage this new cult of
“Justin” in preparation for the 2015 elections with CIC President Bill Graham
playing a key role in the event. Both Al Gore and Larry Summers represent
leading spokesmen of the Canada 2020 policy orientation on the economy and
the environment.
The
Case of Axworthy and Manley
A vital player in this process is
none other than former Principal Secretary to Pierre Trudeau, Thomas Axworthy.
By the end of the 2006 conference, Axworthy had been made responsible for
chairing the Liberal Party Renewal Commission in which he oversaw 36
task forces which examined each aspect of the party. The outcome of Axworthy’s
36 task forces resulted in the current Obama-modeled behaviorist design now
being adopted to brainwash the population to support the cult of Justin under Canada 2020.
Not only is Axworthy the President
of the Walter and Duncan Gordon
Foundation, Senior Fellow at Massey
College, former Executive Director of the Charles Bronfman Foundation, but has
gotten his start in social engineering working as research assistant directly
under Walter Gordon on the 1967 “Task Force on the Structure of the Canadian
Economy” (aka: Gordon Task Force). Axworthy was joined by Walter Gordon’s other
surviving protégé Keith Davey, who also helped co-found Canada 2020 and who participated in
the Gordon 1960 Thinkers Conference.
It is also noteworthy that both
Thomas Axworthy and the 2006 Conference co-chair John Manley were both members
of the Independent Task Force on North America to integrate the North American
Economies under a European Union-modeled zone called the “North American Union”.
Where
we stand now
Bering Strait Tunnel
The only way to stop this green
zero-growth program from being acted upon is the immediate restoration of
Glass-Steagall and the re-enactment of national banking measures to produce the
productive credit necessary to finance those projects which can increase the
energy flux density of society such as NAWAPA,
asteroid defence, the Bering Strait tunnel and Arctic development and
industrialization of the Moon with the mining of Helium-3 for a fusion-based
economy. This means picking up the torch which was dropped with the demise of
C.D. Howe, the Kennedy brothers, de Gaulle, W.A.C. Bennett and Quebec’s great
statesman Daniel Johnson Sr.
[1] It is
important to note that Pearson was not terribly respected by these “new
reformers” led by Gordon, and was largely used as their Nobel Prize winning
instrument. When Pearson became too easily influenced by the pro-C.D. Howe
Liberals remaining in his party such as Robert Winters and Mitchell Sharp, as
well as JFK himself, Pearson was scrapped for a more effective replacement in
the form of Pierre Trudeau in 1968.
[2] For the full
story of Kennedy’s battle to liberate the world from the British Empire, visit www.larouchepac.com/jfk
[3] As Diefenbaker
himself wrote in his autobiography “One of the ironies of recent Canadian history
is that Walter Gordon, a man whom I only met for a few minutes when he
delivered to me his Royal Commission Report, has stated that he decided to do
everything in his power to make Mr. Pearson Prime Minister because he hated me
and feared that my policies would wreck Canada”, Diefenbaker Memoirs,
p.202. Rhodes Scholar Governor of the Bank of Canada, James Coyne, and two
Rhodes scholars embedded in Diefenbaker’s own cabinet (J.M. McDonald, and Davie
Fulton) played a key role in Diefenbaker’s final 1963 downfall and failure of
his Northern Vision.
[4] Stephen Azzi,
Walter Gordon and the Rise of Canadian Nationalism, McGill-Queens Press, 1999,
p.80
[5] The young
Massey, then on the cusp of inheriting the fortunes of his family’s farm
equipment dynasty, had helped install a Round Table chapter in Ontario in 1910
and was rewarded for his services by being sent off to Oxford to study under
the Round Table’s founder and controller, the eugenics obsessed “race patriot”
Lord Alfred Milner in 1911.
[6] Vincent Massey
is quoted from Richard Blake’s From Rights to Needs: A History of Family
Allowances in Canada, UBC Press, p.33
[7] The Canadian
International Council became the new name for the Canadian institute for
International Affairs (CIIA) in 2007. The CIIA had been the new name for the
Round Table Movement, formed in London by Lord Milner in 1910 and run by the
Rhodes Trust network of Oxford scholars in order to advance Cecil Rhodes’
design to recapture America as a lost colony and form the rebirth of a new
globally extended British Empire.
No comments:
Post a Comment