The 'Divine Right of Kings' was a doctrine which asserted that the King at any given time was naturally God's Representative on Earth.
As time went by the Kings started to abuse their powers and this gave rise to discontent in the country and eventually the King's ministers grouped together and over-ruled the King, forming the first Parliament and thereby ending the Divine Right of Kings.
The original purpose in creating a Parliament was thus to end the Divine Right of Kings.
Therefore, it would seem that it must be unconstitutional for Parliament to assume what would appear to be a “Divine Right of Parliament” by enacting: the Public 'Order' Act; the Criminal 'Justice' Act; and now the Anti 'Terrorist' Act, which effectively say that Parliament can now make up any further acts they choose, and we are only allowed to protest against the acts if the Government allows us to do so..
" . . . section 3 of the Criminal Law Act belongs to us all: "A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime . . . "'
http://www.inlap.freeuk.com/ploughsh.htm
" . . . when an Act of Parliament is against common right and reason, or repugnant, or impossible to be performed, the common law will control it, and adjudge such Act to be void." https://law.jrank.org/pages/6484/English-Law-DR-BONHAM-S-CASE.html
THE ‘DUTY OF CARE’ APPLIED TO GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY TO THE SOVEREIGNS
It would appear that successive Governments have KNOWINGLY both acted (i.e. passed UNLAWFUL ACTS OF PARLIAMENT, which are supposed to be enactments of the LAW) to allow "Un-necessary Unreasonable Destruction to all the Sovereigns ", and have omitted to control it, which they ought to have done according to NATURAL LAW.
Therefore it would appear that such Governments are manifestly RECKLESS and CRIMINAL, by act and omission in their Duty to PROTECT our Unalienable RIGHTS for us Sovereigns.
The Government is paid, by the Sovereigns to PROTECT THE NATURAL LAW, and thereby to serve the best interests of the Sovereigns.
To this end therefore the Government is the servant of the Sovereigns, and the Sovereigns are the Masters of the Government.
It is UNLAWFUL for a "master" to employ a "servant" to commit a reckless act (the "vicarious responsibility of a master for the act of a servant");
so if the Government is reckless in it’s Duty of Care for the Sovereigns, then it is unlawful for the Sovereigns to continue this charade and corruption to pay tax to the Government as long as the Government continues to be reckless.
Our intention is not to persuade Sovereigns to withhold their taxes, to do so would hardly be seen as reasonable, prudent and well intentioned.
Our intentions are to EDUCATE the Sovereigns there is a Better Plan and a Future with Prosperity, Freedom, Liberty Property and Land Protection for all.
It is our intention to inform the Sovereigns of the facts and thereby to exert as much time and effort to EDUCATE:
Constitutional Conventions as we may upon the Government to cease its EVIDENT recklessness. Information is here https://unifythepeople.ca/
The ONLY way the government can cease this environmental recklessness is to provide:
ALL REASONABLY AVAILABLE RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT, FOR THE SOVEREIGNS
-anything less being "an omission which is reasonably foreseeable as likely to cause further physical, emotional, mental and spiritual injury" to the Sovereigns, who are the neighbours of the reckless government.
The question which then arises is `What are these “all reasonably available resources”?’
When asked, most Sovereigns will agree that the threat of "Un-necessary SELL OFF OUR RESOURCES Unreasonable" is of a similar magnitude to the threat of war, therefore, we may assert that the resources reasonably available to fight such a threat are of similar magnitude to those which would be made available if we were to have to fight a war.
In other words, according to LAW we should declare a
"State of Emergency" in order to mobilise our collective resources to fight this most serious, REAL AND PRESENT threat to our well-being and security;
~ afterall, we cannot have a healthy economy when our workforce is suffering from the effects of a corrupt government . . .
A State of Emergency for the Sovereigns, would involve combining competitive and co-operative free enterprises, directed and financed towards using all our splendid resources and technologies, to create a future for ourselves and future generations.
The 'Divine Right of Kings' was a doctrine which asserted that the King at any given time was naturally God's Representative on Earth.
As time went by the Kings started to abuse their powers and this gave rise to discontent in the country and eventually the King's ministers grouped together and over-ruled the King, forming the first Parliament and thereby ending the Divine Right of Kings.
The original purpose in creating a Parliament was thus to end the Divine Right of Kings.
Therefore, it would seem that it must be unconstitutional for Parliament to assume what would appear to be a “Divine Right of Parliament” by enacting: the Public 'Order' Act; the Criminal 'Justice' Act; and now the Anti 'Terrorist' Act, which effectively say that Parliament can now make up any further acts they choose, and we are only allowed to protest against the acts if the Government allows us to do so..
" . . . section 3 of the Criminal Law Act belongs to us all: "A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime . . . "' http://www.inlap.freeuk.com/ploughsh.htm
" . . . when an Act of Parliament is against common right and reason, or repugnant, or impossible to be performed, the common law will control it, and adjudge such Act to be void." https://law.jrank.org/pages/6484/English-Law-DR-BONHAM-S-CASE.html
Today, almost everyone knows that the world is corrupt and in a mess. The problem is that most people do not believe that there is anything much we can do about it . . .
The objective of Natural Sovereign Law is to propose a simple, powerful, and effective path for humanity as a whole to overcome this problem, so we can work together in peace, and create a Prosperous place for all by re-claiming our Sovereignty here for ourselves, and for Future Generations.
This proposed path is:
SIMPLE enough for a Child to comprehend.
POWERFUL enough to change peoples' minds in a positive direction.
EFFECTIVE enough to Change the World.
In order to understand this concept, we need to make a distinction between “LAW” and “legislation”.
Imagine there was a LAW which could overturn unlawful legislation . . .
A “LAW”, by definition, is something which cannot be changed . . . whereas "legislation”, which is "man's law" and is written by "governments", can be changed by later legislation, or by a Judicial Review.
For “legislation” to be “LAWFUL” it has to be an “enactment of the LAW”,
~ so the question arises: “WHAT IS THE LAW ? ? ?”
There is a Natural Law of social behaviour which applies to any group of creatures, living at any time, in any possible universe.
This Natural Law is quite simply that: “sovereigns living together do not as a general rule injure each other”.
So, exactly how OLD is this "LAW"? It first appeared on Earth when two or more single-celled first organisms lived together . . . (we said it was SIMPLE . . . !)
If the sovereigns of a community were as a general rule to injure each-other, then that community would get smaller and smaller, until eventually there would only be one member left, which is not a community . . .
Hence, this Law has to be observed by all living systems at any time,or THE LIVING SYSTEM WILL NOT SURVIVE !
It is quite natural in many communities for sovereigns to establish natural law, and during this process some injury may be done, but once the natural law has been established and each sovereign knows and comprehends natural sovereign law, very little further conflict is seen.
This Law may be applied to all living systems, living at anytime, anywhere in any conceivable Universe.
Therefore, if we choose to believe in a Divine Architect who created the Universe, then this is a Natural Principle Of Law, which any "REASONABLE PERSON" HAS TO AGREE WITH.
Even if we do not believe in a Divinity of any kind, the principle still holds good according to both common-sense and simple logic, so atheists, anarchists, and agnostics will accept it too…
“YOU MUST TAKE REASONABLE CARE
TO AVOID ACTS OR OMISSIONS,
WHICH YOU CAN REASONABLY FORESEE,
WOULD BE LIKELY TO INJURE YOUR NEIGHBOUR"
This reasonable and LAWFUL standard of care is applied to all sovereigns in every nation with a Natural Law Jurisdiction including the Government, Corporations, Bankers, and the Legal System itself.
It is necessary at an early stage of planning the process to
pay careful attention to the financial implications and the means of
raising sufficient funds.
All people are entitled to a fair,
participatory, and effective process.
Ways must be
found to minimize costs whenever possible. Sometimes the ambitious goals
of the process must be scaled down. However, if the design of the
process is good and efforts are made to avoid wasteful expenditures, the
international community is likely to assist.
An early estimate of the
costs should be made so that the process can be realistically planned
and efforts to secure support from external sources can be initiated.
Drafting the Constitution
It is becoming common to allow time for public scrutiny
and comments on the draft constitution before it is approved by the
assembly. (“Assembly” here is used to refer to the body that makes the
decision on adoption, even if the adoption is subject to a referendum.) Alberta Assembly were sovereign who volunteered their time and expertise.
The Sovereigns of each Province have been Notified, all major News. Media and the de facto government employees have been Contacted with the information the Sovereigns have initiated a Constitutional Convention.
The advantage of this practice is that the public can react to a
concrete and comprehensive set of proposals, and assess with some
confidence its significance for them and the state.
There has been an OPEN PLATFORM for all Sovereigns the opportunity for prior public consultation, and to add there input into the drafting of the draft Constitution. Here is the sight to join and be involved https://unifythepeople.ca/
Every Sovereign can now judge to what
extent their views have been taken or discussed in Zoom Rooms or ConstitutionalCommittee meetings in Numerous cities through out their respective Provinces. The period of public
consultation can also be seen as a chance for “peer review,” an
examination of the document’s strengths and weaknesses, and the
opportunity to correct policy and drafting errors.
(Some countries have been invited experts to review the draft:
The Process of the Constitution
We in canada Inc understand Political parties in the existing Regime do not represent the Sovereigns. They represent the Canada Inc Corporation.
If the general Sovereign are divided on some issues, here is
another chance to build consensus, during this period fresh differences may emerge .
It is important to ensure that the Sovereigns are correctly
informed about the contents of the draft and allowed to make an
assessment of it.
Here Sovereigns can play a vital
part in the creation https://unifythepeople.ca/
It is surprising how ill-informed debates on draft constitutions
and proposals can be so we have numerous Sovereigns available to listen and educate the draft 7 days a week.
The Role of the Constitution
An understanding of the role of a constitution is critical to
designing the process for making it. And the process is not only for
making the constitution but for generating or creating the environment,
promoting the knowledge, and facilitating the public participation that
are conducive to a good constitution and to the prospects for
implementing it. We therefore begin with a short discussion of the
importance and role of the constitution here: https://unifythepeople.ca/
Enacting the Constitution
The first decision to be made is about which body will
have the primary responsibility for approving or rejecting the draft
constitution.
Here the choice, as noted above, is the constituent assembly.
The second decision is
whether there should be more than one stage of approval.
The most common
instance of more than one stage is when there is a referendum.
Sometimes the draft can go straight from the drafter to the people for a
referendum. This seems to have happened with the constitution of the
European Union, and is stipulated in the Federal Transitional Charter of
Somalia of 2004, but there are other examples. — then a referendum.
It is important that there should be ample
opportunity to consider the suitability of the draft, but too many
approvals place hurdles in the way of enactment, give further
opportunities to the spoilers to regroup, and perhaps need to be
avoided. (the globalists)
The other major decision regarding the design of the
process concerns the rules for decision- making; different institutions
have different levels where a decision to carry on with the process or
to approve the draft will be made. Here the primary question is the
majority required. A simple majority may not be seen to give enough
protection to minorities. The constitution- making process is an
opportunity to build consensus on fundamental national values. Sometimes
this is taken to mean that there must be unanimity.
We feel confident that all Sovereigns will see this as a Future they have dreamed of , Prosperity, Freedom, Liberty, Property, and Land Rights and more.
Recommended for a two-thirds majority if no consensus
was achieved. A large majority is preferable if the Nation is deeply
divided, especially on regional.
We feel very positive the Sovereigns will be very honored to be part of such an amazing document.
(this is where education, is critical ).
Once that was resolved, a referendum for ratification may start.
Increase in Constitution support is being achieved as more are aware of the importance of what this offers, but we still struggle as controlled media, and the Globalist work hard to hinder the information.
There has been much concern with constitutions and
constitution-making in the last 20 years as more are educating themselves on the current system being unaccountable to the Sovereigns.
The New World Order
has expanded its reach of tyranny, have all contributed to the
production of constitutions. The variety of contexts in which
constitutions have been made shows that the primary purposes a
constitution serves vary considerably: nation- building as a new state
emerges. These purposes
determine the orientation of the constitution, and often also the
process by which it is made.
Constitutions are dependent on national contexts in another
significant way. The conception and understanding of, and therefore the
respect for, constitutions vary, depending in considerable part on
national history and the reliance on and respect for law as a key mode
of organizing society and state. So the terms “constitution” is becoming a clear solution to Stop the UN Agenda 21 Globalist plan of Tyranny .
Implementation of the Constitution
Constitutions that are the product of negotiations
in which different interests are carefully balanced, or that seek to
make fundamental changes in the organization of the state and society,
or that are agreed to under external pressure, are not easy to
implement. Many provisions, particularly those dealing with values and
ethical standards, or institutions aimed at accountability and the rule
of Natural law.
Therefore special attention needs to be paid to
the mechanism for a constitution’s implementation and enforcement. This
is seldom done as part of the constitution-making process. In some
recent processes this matter has been addressed by a variety of
measures: a schedule (an annex) in the constitution dealing with
transitional matters; another containing a list of legislative and other
steps necessary for implementation and deadlines for action; an
independent commission with responsibility for supervision and
implementation; a constitutional provision that principles should be
implemented by executive authorities so far as possible, even if no
legislation has been passed; a provision that courts should be able to
give orders within the same framework; the empowering of Sovereigns to participate in the implementation and mobilization of the
constitution; and making the implementation of certain principles a
condition.
What a Constitution will Bring
Our First Constitution can take root easily if the Nation has a
commitment to and the infrastructure necessary for the rule of law. But
other social and political orders of authority may compete with it where
charismatic politics or the tradition of the “strongman” prevails,
where high authority is ascribed to religious or customary leaders, or
where society is closely regulated by social norms, institutions, and
hierarchies. In a society that is largely homogenous, with common values
and aspirations, and with members who have been part of the same state
for a long period, constitutional reform is relatively easy, but not
particularly critical (for example, consider the reform of the
governmental system in Finland in 2000). Such a country may indeed be
able to dispense with, at least, a formal constitution (as is, or at
least until recently was, the case in Great Britain and New Zealand). A
state that has several communities with different languages, religions,
or modes of social organization is less able to rely on common values
and social institutions for the regulation of society. Instead it may
have to depend in part on the values, aspirations, rules, institutions,
and procedures incorporated in the constitution—and this is not easy, as
old loyalties and habits persist but also take on new political
significance.
The provisions of the constitution to protect the rights of
the Sovereigns, promote constitutional values of equality and social
justice, and ensure the integrity and the accountability of the
government.
Hindrance of the Controlled Opposition
One reason is that the state in many developing, and
indeed some developed, countries is the principal means by which
ministers, bureaucrats, and others with special access to the state
accumulate illegal wealth, give state jobs and contracts to relatives
and friends, and protect themselves from due process of the law (by
impunity, bribery, or intimidating the judiciary).
Even when new
institutions to promote the accountability of state organs or fight
corruption or protect Sovereigns’ rights are established (as they are in
many new constitutions), they are corrupted and often rendered
ineffective by ministers, bureaucrats, and tycoons.
A particular difficulty in implementation arises with regard to
constitutions that are made in conflict or post-conflict situations.
They
are made under considerable pressure or even coercion, often from
powerful Globalists.
The Sequencing The Process
By “sequencing,” we mean how the different stages are organized and
ordered, whether there are clear demarcations among them, and whether
the commencement and the conclusion of the process depend on collateral
processes and decisions. There are two distinct issues here.
The sequence depends on
various factors, including the extent of public participation and the
distribution of responsibilities for the different tasks. The sequence
also depends on the purposes of the process, which can include national
reconciliation, nation-building. The first step is
to agree on the need for constitution, the principles
underlying it, and the modalities of the process.
The next is to engage
the public in the process by providing civic education and information
about the process and soliciting the views of the Sovereigns on
constitutional Committees, and Constitutional Conventions. There are different ways in which the Sovereigns can
be engaged; the choice may be to seek public opinion on the basis of a
questionnaire or through an open- ended process, or indeed on the basis of a draft
constitution—or a combination of these.
A central task is the drafting
of the constitution, and here a critical issue is to determine who
should have the principal responsibility for it. The debate on the draft
constitution and its enactment are the next stages, which are often
considered the final ones. But the adoption of a new constitution is
only the beginning of the task of establishing a new political and
social order, and it is extremely important to consider strategies for
implementation as part of constitution-making.
Another general sequencing was the Sovereigns must be consulted before or after the preparation of a draft.
Subsequent consultation gives the public a chance to comment on concrete
proposals, but prior consultation provides greater scope for the
expression of public views and the enhancement of Sovereign’s initiatives.
It is possible to have public consultation both before and after the
draft is prepared, which is what we practice.
Throughout this constitution-making process many
individuals, communities, and interest groups play a part, give
of their time and engage their passion, lobby for different values,
institutions, and procedures, teach or learn about constitutions,
deliberate, and decide. So when planning different stages, it is
necessary to agree on the role of these actors: how they are to be
represented, how they will express their views, and what part they will
play in the actual decision-making.
Constitutions as symbols and manifestos, and as Lawful Rules
A constitution has several dimensions. A distinguished authority on
constitutions, the late Professor Kenneth Wheare, drew a distinction
between those who regard a constitution as primarily and almost
exclusively a legal document in which, therefore, there is place only
for rules of law and for practically nothing else, and those who think
of a constitution as a sort of manifesto, a confession of faith, a
statement of ideals, a “charter of the land” (Wheare 1966). Since he
wrote this in 1966, the debate over the proper function of constitutions
has intensified.
I received an email last week touting Alfred Webre's December 23 "expose" of Kevin Annett and his "ITCCS" fantasy and thought about commenting on it, but put it off until today when I got another email and linked article from Jean Haines (Alfred Webre colleague), who I do not know. I'm not sure it's worth writing about, but I'm greatly annoyed by bleeding heart Leftists who proclaim to the world that they are "truthers" when they cannot think, evaluate, or discern what is honest and what is not. In Webre's case, he simply accepts whatever cockeyed, over-the-top claim or assertion tumbles out of the mouth of the person he's interviewing in his video and nods in agreement with a look of serious concern, hanging onto every word like it's coming from the Oracle of Delphi (if you've watched any of his videos, you know that I mean).
In the Spring of 2011, in numerous radio shows with Don Nicoloff about Fukushima, we often commented on Alfred Webre's promotion of the imbecilic and ludicrous claims of Leuren Moret and her Fukushima Radiation Hysteria Road Show. I took the time to listen to four or five of her absurd Fukushima Youtube video presentations (which seem to number well over 100 even by mid Summer 2011) and found every single one of them simply brimming over with one preposterous statement after another. I wrote a number of articles examining her words and debunked the outrageous fabrications and gross exaggerations she was routinely making in her videos with hard facts, logical analysis, and common sense. Anybody with a reasonable level of intelligence, even a teenager, can do it. Why can't Webre?
I posted a letter on December 2, 2012 from a woman named "Heather M" (see video interviews below with Heather Martin) who took the time to look more closely at Kevin Annett after she had invited him to participate in a small film festival in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (Canada). In the beginning, of course, she thought he was completely legit and thought his film would be a good item for the festival, but after she noticed some things that didn't make sense, she looked deeper and found the guy was saying things that COMMON SENSE told her cannot be true. Here's part of what she said in her letter:
"I found MANY inconsistencies and troublesome statements which I asked him about and he soon became hostile towards me. I had asked him why his was the only name on the ITCCS website and where the address was for the Brussels office and he told me that Brussels was a 'virtual' office and that he had a group of Elders whose identities he was protecting. I found it all too convenient. However, I gave him the benefit of the doubt and assured him I'd do my due dilligence and let him know what we were going to do. Sadly, the more I dug deeper, the less I liked what this man was doing. So my problem with him came when I discovered the Circle of Justice letter and read his response to it. Then I read his article about how the government and Health Canada were engaged in genocide by injecting First Nations with (as he called it) "Tamiflu Vaccine". As a vaccine researcher, I knew this wasn't right. As I'm sure even you know, Tamiflu and the vaccine are two separate drugs... I wondered how Kevin could not have known that himself. In that article he grossly exaggerated the intentions of the government and stirred up fear, based on absolutely no factual evidence at all. This was a modus operandi I came to learn Kevin uses all the time. "
If you do a Google search of "Kevin Annett, debunked," you will come up with dozens of web sites that expose Annett as a pathological mountebank. Many articles are dated in 2014 and 2013, of course, but some articles (like mine) go back to 2012 and even 2011. Doesn't Alfred Labremont Webre, the "international lawyer" (a meaningless term), self proclaimed sovereign and "judge," know how to use a search engine and VET people BEFORE he invites them to be interviewed?
To all outward appearences, Alfred Webre comes across as a sincere individual. He may be legit, but easily duped. I don't know. His liberal mindset may be ruled by his emotions rather than his intellect. If he is legit, and not working for somebody (which I wouldn't rule out), then he's either as lazy as they come and can't be bothered with fact checking, or he's dumber than a door nail, or he's your typical Far Lefter who will accept ANY allegation, no matter how illogical, just as long as it fits the Leftist meme of "victimization." In any case, The Annett case demonstrates that he can't discern squat and should not be taken seriously. If he is working in some capacity (wittingly or not) for The World Conquerors, who constantly strive to conceal their role in creating false front stories for their black operations in order to obfuscate, confuse, or get people to accept their propaganda themes (Fukushima radiation hype), then he's doing a bang up job with the likes of Moret or Annett.
In Annett's case, his lies are too obvious and too pathological not to be caught by the general public. So what's the point? The ulterior purpose may be to cast doubt upon all genuine claims of native Canadian children who have been killed or abused (which certainly exists) by pedophiles, government officials, experimenters, etc.
Another thing that concerns me is Alfred's outlandish and unsubstantiated (unless he's depending on Annett's claims of "evidence") allegations about the ("Satanic") Pope and the Jesuits ("The Jesuits, Ebola and Beheadings: Trying to Get the New World Order Going" ), which Leuren Moret seems to have taken up lately ("Russia protects humanity against Jesuitism, as did Tsar Alexander II"). Bear in mind that destroying Christianity (and Catholicism is still the largest Christian sect on the planet) is a central theme espoused in the Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion.
For a guy who claims to have been raised Catholic in Cuba, he makes a lot dark assertions about the Vatican without providing any real proof or evidence of anything.
Alfred's web site articles are one sensationalist headline after another. Does reading sensational articles of this milieu really accomplish anything of value to slow down the Zio New World Order takeover? I know it brings a lot of traffic, but is it really helping?
If we don't spend our time focusing on removing the traitors in elect-able political office who are selling us out to The World Conquerors, day by day, month by month, and year by year, then all the sensational stories in the world aren't going to make one whit of difference in the satanic, feudal, police state that Zion's fifth columnists, agents and sellouts are delivering us to.
Ken Adachi
Copyright 2015 Educate-Yourself.org All Rights Reserved.
Kevin Annett is a defrocked priest who has taken-up a second career as a con-artist/grifter. Annett has convinced a bunch of unwitting people that he is the saviour of Indigenous people everywhere, and the only person who is working on their behalf. This is not true- rather, he is using their cause for his own personal gain. Kevin is most famous for his faking of the discovery of a ‘mass grave’ at the Six Nations Reserve in Brandford, Ontario. Apparently, he is pulling the same con at other reserves- one has to feel sorry for all of the people who he is building false hope for. Curiously, Kevin Is an International Socialist, and has deep connections to the people who were involved in hijacking the occupy movement. Some of his relations include Winnie Ng, Sakura Saunders, and Judy Rebick.
Kevin Annett Must Be Stopped http://stopkevinannett.weebly.com/ My name is Heather Martin. I am a Registered Nurse, activist and blogger. I’m the creator of the blog Kevin Annett Must Be Stopped and this is my testimony of my experience with Kevin Annett. I’m doing this today as a way of getting my own story out so that people who have had something to do with him, who think they are supporting a man of the cloth, who are supporting a man who is trying to bring down The Powers That Be can understand that this is not really who they are supporting. It’s important to know that for the last three and a half years, I’ve written over 140 articles using Kevin’s own words and work to expose him as a con artist and a fraud. I’ve used his claims and the facts to show people that the ITCCS does not exist, the ICLCJ does not exist and that nothing Kevin has claimed to have done is true.
Video interviews exposing Kevin Annett
Comment posted at Youtube video seen below:
Ken bear-chief 3 weeks ago
"I first met Kevin Annett in 2009 during a blog radio interview I was invited to. He really paid attention to what I was saying about the Catholic School abuses and genocide committed upon Native American children in the United States, and I commented that the same things that transpired in Canada with the First Nations at those clergy operated residential schools also happened among my people. Of course Kevin Annett tried recruiting me to help him with his efforts in Canada. However, I began to hear some unsettling things about him, so I began to investigate him and discovered that he had a long history of stealing survivor accounts of abuse and publishing them without the Elders' consent, and that he had been making false claims that he had single handedly brought the Anglican Church to its knees and forced it and the Canadian Government to issue and apology and make reparations to the First Nations peoples. Of course this was false, the apology and reparations was won by First Nation's activists and survivors of the residential schools who filed lawsuits in the Canadian courts. Kevin Annett had nothing to do with it. Yet he has traveled the world claiming to have done so. Fast forward to his ITCCS tribunal which was a total fake, full of made up officials, jurors, prosecutors, judges, etc.. the only person who actually existed that was a part of it was KEVIN ANNETT. Since then he has continued to lie, and commit fraud, and do anything it takes to perpetuate his on-line solicitations and continue bilking the unknowing public who he convinces to fund his "work". The man is a con artist, liar, fraud, and a narcissistic, ego maniacal, sociopath with absolutely no morals, ethics, or compassion for the survivors of child sex abuse in any country. Stay clear of him, and please do not support his fraudulent causes."
Heather Martin interview with Rachael Kavanagh on Kevin Annett https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33FBSFkj2p4
Published on Dec 12, 2014
Rachael Kavanagh is interviewed by Heather Martin on her experience being an administrator for ITCCS. Rachael describes how she met Kevin Annett and how not long afterwards began to have doubts about the validity of his Common-law court and how Kevin Annett smeared her name on various Facebook groups and on the ITCCS site. She asks anyone considering supporting Kevin Annett and giving him money to do their research.
Kevin Annett exposed by Cari Lee Revenlifter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3M9ufk0tyqk Published on Nov 16, 2014
Is Kevin Annett a FRAUD? No evidence to back up Ninth Circle Arrests Published on Aug 18, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw1WYYS0s5c
Araya Soma exposes Kevin Annett as the con man of the century Published on Dec 27, 2014
Araya Soma is the latest of several whistleblowers coming forward to reveal the real motives behind Kevin Annett and the ITCCS. Araya describes how Annetts cancellation of his speaking engagement and her offer to support his work got her evicted from her home. She describes how Brussels is a Cannon-Law jurisdiction and how Kevin Annett uses the banner of 'saving the children' to lure people into supporting him despite the lack of evidence.
geofffxdwg07 2 weeks ago
I am so angry with Kevin Annett I thought I would share this with you......................Narcissist behavior is all the same, whether in a romantic relationship, or a family relationship, the goal as well as the end of a relationship is all the same.. They refuse responsibility- It is never their fault and will never be their fault so move along... They Lie- Every one of them, If their mouth is moving you can bet they are lying...Their mere existence is a lie. They look down on you- They are superior, to them anyway, and you will never be good enough or even equal to them They are two faced- Sometimes 3 or 4 faced, Only the people closest to them or in a relationship with them will see the real person behind the mask...Others think they are exactly who they portray..A god.. They are vindictive- Never question them, especially with honesty or healthy boundaries, You will be public enemy no. 1, the punishments are often ruthless and you will pay! They project psychologically- Anything they accuse you of doing, is what they are doing, so be prepared to defend yourself..If they are lying, they say you are, If they accuse you of cheating and being sneaky its because they are! They Smear- They will trash your name and all you are to whoever will listen in order to make you look like the crazy abusive one and not them!..............................sound familiar?
araya soma 2 weeks ago
one of his daughters has actually disowned him sadly..... the way he fucked up the whole cause of genocide with the natives is epic and in itself criminal enough to put him in jail forever....i am so so anticipating that he goes down and that the real good work dealing with those issues the proper way can start FINALLY !
Matti Smith 1 week ago
Kevin is a disgusting monster!! misleading people so justice could never be achieved by stealing and misplacing real evidence so therefore crimes could never be prosecuted and punished, people naively trusted him to be doing something about it and stopped others setting up real courts for 20 years, he should be taken to court and stand trial for all the lies and fraud.
Frankie More 2 weeks ago
"What has he done in 20 years" ? EXACTLY. He has done nothing. He has left four ex-wives behind him - two of which he has smeared. And two abandoned little daughters whose lives he endangered by claiming that their mother divorced him with money from the United Churches of Canada. How could that man be considered as a champion of children? Do you see his two adult daughters standing up today and praising the great Dad that they have? Thank you for your bravery in speaking out Araya.
Who Is Kevin Annett?
http://alpha411.blogspot.com/2013/03/who-is-kevin-annett.html Friday, March 15, 2013
Kevin Annett (on right) with NDP Socialist Caucus Founder Barry Weisleder
***
Kevin Annett was one of the worst disasters to hit Canada’s indigenous communities in the past 20 years. He’s a former United Church minister who was defrocked after losing his cool and refusing to meet with a church psychiatrist. Once he left the church he began his long-con- appropriating the voices of Indian Residential School survivors and using their stories to get naïve (or bad intentioned) people to support his crusade against the Pope, the Queen, and the governments of the world.
In 2011 Annett went to the Six Nations reserve in Brantford, Ontario and faked the discovery of a mass grave of residential school survivors. His fraud was exposed and he was publicly humiliated- even the Aboriginal People’s Television Network got involved, producing an in-depth report debunking him. Annett later lied about filing a court case against the Queen, the Pope, Harper & ‘Big Pharma’- he was quickly disproved.
How does one top faking a mass grave and a lawsuit against the Queen? Well, it seems that Annett has gone off the deep-end now, he announced yesterday that he was single-handedly responsible for the resignation of the Pope!
No, it’s not April Fool’s day. That said, it appears that there are still fools out there who are listening to Annett. There are people so disillusioned with how they see the world that they’re willing to grasp at Annett’s straws and believe his stories. Some people lost their dignity, some lost their money- many residential school survivors got to feel what it was like to be violated once more. He violated survivors after their death- forging the signature of Harriett Nahanee, one of the most respected indigenous activists in Canada.
When people called Annett out on his bad behaviour, he’d retaliate by coordinating vicious attacks on people who asked too many questions. He smeared Jan Longboat, an elder and professor who spent her life studying and teaching her knowledge of indigenous culture. He made webpages slandering people, calling residential school survivors ‘dimestore indians’, and spreading rumours that people were ‘agents of the state’. The slander and attacks got so bad that Dennis Banks and Royce White Calf from the American Indian Movement made a public declaration (on this site) that Annett was a danger to native communities.
Before he entered the church, Kevin Annett was an activist. When he left, he was an organizer for the Canadian Auto Workers- trying to recruit United Church clergy into the union.
Annett’s involvement with activism began while he was a Master’s student at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. In Toronto, he was one of the founding members of the International Socialists- a spin off group that was created after the Waffle was ejected from the NDP. His network included many people who were (and are) influential on the left- Barry Weisleder, Winnie Ng, Judy Rebick and George Galloway to name a few.
It was those connections that allowed Annett’s long-con to thrive and grow. He was invited to speak at their meetings, Ryerson University (and CAW Sam Gindin Chair) Winnie Ng wrote glowing letters about his ‘work’, he shared the stage with Judy Rebick, Galloway interviewed him on his radio show.
Intentional or not, Annett was a valuable tool for the people in the militant left- particularly for their efforts to create agitation in indigenous communities. One community where the radicals (with a strong representation from the CAW) have a foothold is the Six Nations. Annett’s claims of finding a mass grave was exactly what they needed to spur division. The hate Annett created for peacemakers like Jan Longboat only helped the radicals further their cause.
In many ways the Kevin Annett affair is a microcosm of Canada’s radical activist community- the same players, the same style of agitation, the same pattern of vicious lies, smears and attacks. That’s not a coincidence, Annett learned everything he knew from this community.
Today I was viciously attacked, once again, by some of the very same people. A story was published on the Media Co-Op’s webpage slandering me with a laundry list of lies and vicious smears. They label me as a far-right ‘reactionary’ because I view violence and dishonesty as a danger to the success of genuine activism. The article also appears to many as a veiled call to violence against me.
Curiously, someone from the House of Commons read that story- arriving on my site from the story in the Media Co-Op. It’s good to see people in government are paying attention.
Someone claiming to be with Anonymous then tweeted out that I’ve been framing activists for false crimes. Afterwards, 100′s of people came to my site. Luckily, many have come to me and expressed their regret that this happened to me.
With all the child abuse cases by the church coming to light, it is no surprise that someone like Kevin Annett and his ITCCS.org is gaining popular or should I say sheeple support. After all, we want the culprits to face justice.
But, you have to remember that Kevin left or was kicked out of the United Church in 1996/97. So he is no reverend anymore. And, imo, his so called court proceedings etc. etc. are a giant hoax to fool people into believing they have a say in those kinds of affairs. And, of course, line his own coffers.
For your perusal, and you really have to do some reading to get to the bottom of it:
Non-Reverend Kevin Annett, his one man web site and his so-called international tribunal which has no legal standing whatsoever is a desperate attempt of self-promotion. He has hitched his wagon to public concerns and the business of victimhood which seems to be making good money. Do we detect any correlation between the Annett business and the main topic of this website?
He is all over the net, same as the weasels and the franks.
I’m always amazed how people fall for an official looking presentation and a title before or after a name.
And you must know that most of the time “the” church doesn’t kick out their wayward clergy. They just send them to another unsuspecting community.
The “Rev. Kevin D. Annett” has no credibility whatever. He was defrocked for his anti-Christian activities and now runs a one-man blog from a seedly basement room in Toronto. He is living on welfare and by scrounging money from various sources.
He calls himself “Secretary” of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS), allegedly based in Brussels, and has announced that criminal proceedings are to be taken against the Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury” for various crimes against humanity.
As there is no such organization as the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) registered in Brussels, and since Mr Annett is no more than an unemployed defrocked priest running a one-man blog from Toronto, one can only laugh at all this nonsense.
Rehmat as usual is wasting our time.
He has posted an off-topic comment here which has no relevance to the subject under discussion, i.e., strippers in a Jew-owned geriatric home.
The past week has been a whirlwind, nay, an F5 Hurricaine of revelations resulting the breach of the ITCCS levy. Most certainly, Kevin’s life is flooded beyond repair as the revelations of womanizing, abuse of trust, fraud and criminality are coming to full sunlight. He is in damage control mode and grasping for whomever might be within reach to throw him a lifeline.
Case in point is the flurry of Urgent Action Communique’s coming from the so-called office of the Directorate of the ITCCS and it’s Director, Marie L. Bouchard aimed at threatening former supporters like Alfred Webre into submission. Until this week there has never existed a hint of an actual address in Brussels for the official Offices of ITCCS, but now we learn that it’s somewhere located in the postal code of 1040 (nestled in amongst all those nice UN/EU/NWO organizations). And even more surprising is to find out that an actual person might represent here, not just Kevin Annett broadcasting from his ‘undisclosed location’ in the attic of Lori’s house.
As was revealed in the previous article, Bouchard has quite a prestigious reputation, is an academic and holds “white-paper-power” within the research community on issues of Socio-economics. The question is, is she really that big of a player in ITCCS or is she more likely someone that Kevin has ‘tapped’ to add street-cred’s to his crumbling facade? The latter is more likely as was revealed in Kevin’s latest attempt at intimidation and posturing towards Alfred Webre. Here is a letter sent by someone named Nina (Vera) Ohman (who apparently really, really loves cats) to the ‘circle of friends’ of the ITCCS:
———- Forwarded message ———- From: Nina Ohman <veraohman@gmail.com> Date: 12 December 2014 at 11:19 Subject: Proclamation of independance from Kanata movement To: PRINCESA DE DIOS ERIKA LOPEZ <siervadelreino731@gmail.com>
A Special Communique and Call to Action from the Republic of Kanata
Issued to all volunteers and organizers in Kanata’s Six Districts
by Kevin Annett
Special Adviser to the Republic’s Provisional Council in Winnipeg
December 6, 2014
“I didn’t know we and the common law had power until that Mountie backed right off …”
This remark from a protestor at the Kinder-Morgan dispute last week in Vancouver could sum up the transformation shaking our nation and the world these days. The protestor had just handed an RCMP officer a copy of our Republic’s Stand Down Order to “crown” officials, and the officer had complied.
The protestor – a young woman in her twenties – signed up with the Republic the next day.
Hundreds of others like her, and you the reader, have taken the same step in the past few months, and are poised to help inaugurate the Republic of Kanata in the new year of 2015. And we will do so not simply through a Proclamation of Independence but by direct actions to take back our land and liberties, and restore the Common Law as our governing authority.
As sovereign men and women, you have the God given power and the right and obligation to do so. And here is how we will accomplish it:
The Proclamation. After four drafts were debated and amended, our Proclamation of Independence received final assent by our Provisional Council last Monday. This Proclamation declaring our sovereignty will be read publicly and enacted at a foundational ceremony on the morning of January 1, 2015, at five locations across Kanata. On that day, the Republic of Kanata will come into lawful existence. The first Congress of the new Republic will be convened during 2015.
The Constitution and High Court of the Republic. The Proclamation will authorize a new Constitution for the Republic, which will provide for common law courts of justice, including a High Court of the Republic under whose authority local courts will operate. This step will lawfully disestablish the laws and governance of “Canada” and the crown, and legitimate our laws and actions as a Republic.
Reclaiming the Nation.On January 15, a fortnight after Independence Day, our Republic will commence direct and ongoing actions to actively reclaim the land and the law by land seizures, nullification of debts and taxes, and take over of public facilities. Not only the RCMP and police, but all “crown” officials across Kanata, will have their power revoked, and all bills, taxes, statutes and laws of the former corporate entity called Canada will be made null and void. In their place, we will actively establish new laws and institutions designed to return wealth and power to all the people.
You, the nearly one thousand members of the Republic, are the seed from which this new nation will emerge. Each of you must recruit, educate and mobilize other men and women over the next few months as part of this campaign and Proclamation of Liberty.
As part of this notification, you have received the names and contact information of the other Republic volunteers in your community. You are to gather together immediately and do the following:
Establish a local branch of our Republic and elect three officers: A Branch Convener, an Education and Membership Coordinator, and a Direct Action Coordinator. Hold one public action and one branch meeting every week.
Distribute our Proclamation and literature to the public and involve them in our direct actions, including the establishment of local Republican Common Law Courts.
Take the Pledge of Allegiance to the Republic, sign up others to do the same, and pay dues to the local branch of no less than five percent of your monthly income. (All of your funds will remain in your local branch to supply your actions).
More advice and resources will be provided to you through our official publications and website (www.republicofkanata.com) . The head Convener for your District will be in touch with all of you directly.
If you are reading this, you are the Republic. From you and you alone will issue the future: a reclaimed land, wiped clean of the corruption and crimes of the present, and governed by the Natural Law of equality, peace and liberty. From you alone will come the ideas and actions that will ensure that our children are raised as healthy and free people, as true sovereigns in their own land of Kanata: a federation of free and equal nations.
“Though we may fail today, our principles will triumph tomorrow, taking seed and arising anew in the lives of new generations of free people … I have hope in our future.”
May these words of Canada’s first Republican leader, William Lyon McKenzie, come true and guide us in the days ahead, and give us the courage to triumph through the grace of God.
(I’ve redacted Kevin’s usual signature of ‘evidence’ and shameless self-promotion statements and video’s for your convenience….You’re welcome!) Nina’s signature follows below: Folks my excuses 4 my language but now we have 2 name everything by their name so real power eradicates all evil minds and works on planet earth, This is 4 the loving intelligent people, assholes don’t have enough intelligence to coop with it or they are dying like flies due to their own lethal radiation, they set THE MACHIME 4 MURDER AND GENOCIDE, DON’T ALLOW ACTA NOW, say yes to kanata movement within yourselves and stop MURDER MASSIVE POLLUTION NOW THAT YOU CAN OR YOU WILL BE NEXT VICTIM OF ILLUMINATI OR WHATEVER THE BANKERS AND MONOPOLIES STINKY ASSES NAME IS, NEW WORLD ORDER IS HISTORY, I FUCKED THEM ALL WITH MY FALUS WEAPON ISSUED FROM BIRTH BY NINAOHMAN, (I AM NINAOHMAN’S SON, THE RETURN OF MAYTREYA AND OHMAN TOGETHER WITHIN THE SACRED BODY OF THE GODDESS MAYTREYA OR CHRIST, BUDDHA OR MOHAMMED ENERGY READY 2 DEFEAT AND ELIMINATE ANY PARASITES NOT ONLY ON PLANET EARTH, I AM CLEANING THE WHOLE INFINITE UNIVERSE O DATA/SOUL/FUCKERS, SOBEITSOITIS) THAT SHUTS LETHAL GOLDEN LIGHT, SOBEITSOITIS, DON’T BE PART OF EVIL ANYMORE AND SPREAD VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE THAT TALK ABOUT THRUTH AND ACTUAL REALITIES THAT WE CAN TOGETHER OR ALONE MAKE IT HAPPEN 4 LIFE AND FREE SERVICES, FOODS, SHELTER AND ALL WHAT WE NEED TO LIVE AND BE HAPPY, FUCK THE MONEY, FUCK ALL GOVERNMENTS AND ARMIES, WE ARE BILLIONS OF ARMIES WITH LETHAL WEAPONS READY 2 SHUT SHIT BY THE POWER OF THOUGHT AND UNCONDITIONAL LOVE, HERE I SEND YOU BASTARDS PIECES OF SHIT A SAMPLE JUST 2 TRY IT, ALL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS START BEING OCCUPIED BY WE CITIZENS OF PLANET EARTH ARMED WITH BEAM TECH, SOBEITSOITIS, ALL GOVERNMENT LEADEERS, RELIGION LEADERS AND MONOPOLIES LEADEERS AS FOOD CHAINES, DRUGS AND HOSPITAL ARE SET DEAD PENALTY ALONG WITH THEIR ILLUMINATI MASTERS OF DESTRUCTION, SOBEITSOITIS,
“Acts And Arts 4 Life”
Several things jump out at me (that’s an understatement!):
1) Marie L. Bouchard’s (or that of her husbands) email address appears to be listed among those cc’d in this communique.
2) Elizabeth May and the lovely people at the Peruvian heiroglyph-destroying organization also known as ‘GreenPeace’ are getting these Urgent Action Updates.
3) George Dufort is suspiciously absent from the ITCCS Communique.
4) Crazy people and scammers can be seen everywhere!
Yup, the above image pretty-much sums up how I view some of the Kevin Annett crowd…..a…..little….scary….!
Case in point is miss Nina herself, who seems to have an obsession with ‘asses’ and how clean they are (according to the signature on the email above and her profile here):
“I am a great ass of real knowledge to bring real changes to the whole universe, read my story now. This biography may shock or give the tools to move on in life and become a real human being that cares about life, good asses are those that can communicate by telepathy to let know the person that inhabit that ass, the imperatives of stop being inside your box of egomaniac behaviour and start acting as a single mind, spirit, physical life form to contribute to save your ass that may be stinky now because is full of shit not evacuated either in your physical body or your belief systems in your intellect, I invite to read my story experience with my ass that occurred in 1997. We all as individuals can become clean asses and be happy forever if w stop being only thinking instead of being and feeling the experience of your life that will bring you to get in touch with real data or information in your minds that will bring total fulfillment and will avoid you to be stinky asses that are maybe contaminating others, this is the story of my ass talking telepathically to me in 1997, (this is spanish and french short paragraph so they can understand what am I talking about if these people don’t speak english, el buen culo que somos todos los seres si llegamos a la conciencia total como yo llegue, ahora ya no pienso soy, le bon cu que nous devenir et arreter de penser mais etre). Transmutation means to be totally conscious so your thinking experience becomes a feeling experience, now I think with my ass or any organ I focus on since already 18 years, 24 hrs a day even sleeping, this is a short story how I talked to my ass to heal him/her of having hemorrhoids for 2 days, I have not been sick or ill since 24 years and I didn’t have a cold since 15 years, but due to pollution and evil government services I became sick of multiple allergies and I can’t be outdoors when sun light since last year 2012, all happened because I had already a fragile momentary problem of Natural Radiation that entered my body to transmute me in what I became since 1998, A FUCKING CLEAN AND GREAT ASS, all this happened only because I am one of the greatest asses that ever lived and still lives here on Earth, when I say ass, it means as a metaphor and in real terms that we have to evacuate all shit accumulated in us or ass? you where the world ass will lead ass, to the void of existence to gain real knowledge because everything was made from a hole called Life in fo”
This woman who is reportedly Kevin’s ‘main-squeeze’ is clearly is in need of some specialized help.
Then we have Paul Birdsall, who ran a Multi-Level Marketing scam similar to HerbalLife where you pay $39.95 for a package/membership so you can be authorized to sell other people package/memberships for $39.95 and get a percentage of the proceeds. His company, Partner With Paul didn’t last long after being reviewed as an internet marketing scam, so he moved onto another one he created called 7 Day Online Success Bootcamp!! Now, I’m all for personal improvement, but an MLM marketing scam dressed up as a ‘bootcamp’ is still an MLM marketing scam.
A friend of mine sent his thoughts on this latest correspondence posted on News Inside Out and had this to say:
Oh Boy!
Where would one start here and where would one finish.
The terms ‘nutbar’ and ‘wingnut’ were new to me until mid 2013.
I first came across them when Greg (Renouf) posted about Rhianne Baines when her crew ‘stormed’ the church in Coventry.
They are not terms we use in Ireland nor did I ever hear them in the UK when I lived there but they are the only two words that now adequately describe most off the people that I have been looking at, researching and listening to on You Tube for the past year or more.
I get lost in all this sometimes and indeed only for Heather’s patience and assistance in explaining this ‘new age’ craze to me, I would never have been able to even get on step one on the ladder of even trying to understand it.
And yet the more I think that I have a little handle on it the more something comes up (like this latest rant at the end of this message) the more I feel that I havent a clue what’s going on.
I grew up in an insane environment. I can see that clearly today. But it was a community of insane ‘stupid’ people. I don’t have nice words to describe this but it’s how I see it.
They lacked a good education so the word stupid describes them best.
I wasn’t surrounded by intellectual people.
So I would describe them as stupid and mad – in equal doses.
But what I am seeing today is a whole new level of people whom I would describe as intellectual (very clever, well educated people like Annett and Webre).
And yet their insanity and the insanity of those who devoutly and blindly follow them is way above any of the insanity that I witnessed among the ‘stupid’ people that created my environment when I was a child.
It’s difficult to explain this but for some reason I managed (as a child and now as an adult) to understand the madness of the ‘stupid’ people and to somehow exist among them.
To a great degree when it comes to intellectual education – I would class myself as ‘stupid’ too.
I have learned to understand my own ‘madness’ (for want of a better word) a madness that allows me to put my neck on the block and have the ‘balls’ to do things alone that others in my circles would never dream of doing and I have learned to channel my ‘madness’ in my protest work and face people in very high authority – without fear.
I have learned to use that ‘madness’ for my own protection – basically.
But this intellectual madness – this intellectual insanity – is something out of this world.
What I am witnessing now with Webre and Annett… would be extremely funny to watch if it weren’t for the serious effect it is having on people and ’causes’ that I identify with.
This is crazy beyond belief. Insanity beyond belief.
What the f*** is wrong with these people?
The internet has become a haven for loopers and unfortunately I happened to associate myself with the King of the loopers- Kevin Annett.
I hope there is a reason for it.
I hear religious people speak of ‘gods master plan’ and that ‘he has a reason for everything’.
If there is a god I hope he knows what he is doing cause I havent a f***** clue whats going on….. LOL
The Catechism offers a clear moral teaching: "Rape is the forcible violation of the sexual intimacy of another person. It does injury to justice and charity. Rape deeply wounds the respect, freedom, and physical and moral integrity to which every person has a right. It causes grave damage that can mark the victim for life. It is always an intrinsically evil act. Graver still is the rape of children committed by parents (incest) or those responsible for the education of the children entrusted to them." (no. 2356) Note that rape is "an intrinsically evil act," meaning that it is evil at its very root, nothing justifies it, and it is objectively a mortal sin. An evil act was done against me, a crime, by a priest at St Thomas More Parish in Durham, NH. An evil and a crime I will no longer keep silent about. Those who perpetrate crimes against children, especially those of the Roman Catholic Church, should all be punished for their crimes against children. Anything less would be criminal. View all posts by victimsofrapebythercc
2 thoughts on “The Madness of King Kevin- DISTURBING CONTENT WARNING!!!”
Dave E
Kevin Annette has to be put out of business, plain and simple.
Like