Friday, 14 August 2020

AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEEKIS QUEEN VICTORIA THE YEAR 1665 ON THE BARGAIN 1835

 

AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEKIS & QUEEN VICTORIA THE YEAR 1665 ON THE BARGAIN 1835



New King Chief of Canada, I am writing to you, We have to change the rules of the whites. We will put Head Office in Canada on the Indian Act, and superintend on provincial rules.

Lawyer for your Business, Doctor, Indian Affairs, and this is on the Indian Act, and rules of Canada.

In the year of 1820 we sent Simpson to control the company, in the year 1821 we sued Hudson for selling your goods, so, I am renewing the treaty and money. One hundred and twenty dollars ($120.00) a year and tax free. The rules of the Indian Act of Canada, when the year is due, the Superintendent will give you your money tax free.

Now you will have to make township. The whites will have to pay you for everything you have, you make head townships in Canada, have reservations to keep the whites off the RESERVE, and Free Indian Navigation. Free grass for settlers and timber of 100 Acres. We leave it as you gave it to the settlers, only the pine for the lumberman, and sixty-feet on shoren Navigation Rights, if you are on the boat.

It’s free travelling all over Canada, anyplace you go. If you want a house in Canada, you go to the Superintendent, put in your order and he will see that it is built. It will cost you nothing, they will pay for it. I will put a Warden in, to mind your game wherever your animal will make its tracks in Canada you can follow it until you get it. If the whites want your animal they will have to pay for it with a license.

If you work for a white man, they cannot garnishee your wages. The whites have to pay taxes, you are entitled to THREE percent on the taxes, and THREE percent on the timber and $3.00 stumpage beside, and FIVE percent on the Mines, and if you have money in the Bank it is FIVE percent; also game money is yours. If the whites crowd you, you are to go to the Superintendent and put in your complaint and he will take it up to the lawyer and he will be prosecuted.

The Bargain is made and I am sending you a scroll as good as gold, as long as there is an Indian in the country from generation to generation, King Chief Brother, I am telling you, a nephew is born. My son. I am your sister Queen Victoria, forever this Bargain, we made between you and I, will stand; as long as there is water in the Lakes and run in the Rivers and Creeks, and the green grass grows. This Bargain, the year 1665 comes the year 1835, is good as long as the sun and moon shines, it cannot change.

This Bargain is for the KING CHIEF of CANADA, from QUEEN VICTORIA



Thursday, 13 August 2020

WALTER KUHL LETTER

 

WALTER KUHL LETTER

Imagine! A politician who addressed Canada’s great dilemma.
The Walter Kuhl Letter walter kuhl letter | canadian politician
The Walter Kuhl letter is one that every Canadian should read – if for one reason only, to “jolt” the reader. Who is Walter Kuhl? Walter Kuhl was a teacher and elected politician to the Canadian House of Commons from 1935 to 1949.
Walter Kuhl wrote this letter in 1976 to Rene Levesque, Premier of Quebec, Leader of the Party Quebecois, when Levesque was stirring Quebec with its referendum for separation. So profound was this letter that Levesque went to Ottawa to meet with Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau to ask Trudeau if the Kuhl Letter was factual.
On a number of occasions, evidenced with all the historic legal documents in hand, Walter brought to other politician’s attention, the fact that Canada was never actually – lawfully – confederated into a sovereign state.
Some of the documents available here represent the evidence of his work:
  • Here is the letter to Rene Levesque addressing Quebec’s will to separate. In this letter he made it clear to Mr. Levesque that Quebec was, and continues to be, a sovereign nation, as do ALL provinces in Canada.
Spruce Grove, Alta., R.R. I,
November 23rd, 1976.
The Hon. Rene Levesque,
Premier-elect,
Province of Quebec,
Quebec, P.Q.
Dear Mr. Levesque:

Congratulations on your magnificent personal victory and that of your Parti Quebecois in the recent Quebec election.

As a student of Canadian constitutional history and of Canadian constitutional problems for some 40 years, I am tremendously interested in the constitutional implications of your recent political victory.

For 14 years, from 1935 to 1949, it was my privilege to serve as a member of the House of Commons, from the province of Alberta. The withholding of assent to some Alberta legislation in those years by the Lieutenant-Governor and the dis-allowance of other Alberta legislation by the people at Ottawa, set me to investigating how these things could be. I was assisted in my studies by R. Rogers Smith, who was personally acquainted with a onetime private secretary to John A. MacDonald at the time when the B.N.A. Act was being enacted.

Through this source, I have become acquainted with much information concerning the history of the B.N.A. Act which is not to be found in textbooks. All this information has led me to the conclusion that the existing constitutional circumstances are shocking to the point of unbelief. However, in my considered opinion, after 40 years of intensive study, these existing constitutional circumstances are of such a nature that they can be of extreme advantage to you in governing your province.

I am enclosing copies of some of the addresses which I delivered in the House of Commons on the subject, as well as copies of a pamphlet by Mr. Smith, dealing with the same subject. If you have not already been made acquainted with this material, I trust it will prove enlightening and helpful to you in the constitutional considerations in which you obviously are going to become involved.
Although the enclosed material should give you a clear outline of what I conceive to be your present standing constitutionally as a province, 1 would like to give you a brief summary of what I believe to be your present position. So far as separation. is concerned, rather than it is necessary to seek separation rights through a referendum, THE PROVINCE OF
QUEBEC IS ALREADY COMPLETELY CONSTITUTIONALLY SEPARATED FROM THE REST OF CANADA ! ! !! This is equally true of every other province in Canada and has been so since December 11, 1931, through the Statute of Westminster.

HOW CAN YOU BE DIVORCED IF YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN MARRIED?
In other words, ever since the enactment of the Statute of Westminster in 1931, by the British Government, each of the provinces of Canada has been a completely sovereign and independent state, and because the provinces have signed nothing since then constituting a Federal Union and a Federal Government, and because no such treaty has been ratified by the people of Canada, the provinces still enjoy the status of sovereignty and are privileged to use it in any way they see fit.

As you will observe from the enclosed addresses, I quote eminent Canadian constitutional authorities as suggesting that the only and the logical solution to the existing constitutional circumstances is the drafting and the adoption of a proper federal constitution in which the provinces can reserve for themselves any and all powers necessary to enable them to govern their provinces successfully.

I am sure you can appreciate that if this were done, you could solve your economic and other problems in Quebec without resorting to separation. I feel sure that having the ability to solve your problems and still remain constitutionally part of the country of Canada, would be much more satisfactory to your supporters as well as to others within your province.
The following is a summary of the reasons for the things I have just stated:

1. At the time of Confederation movement in Canada, the Provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick desired to form a Federal Union.

2. The Quebec Resolutions of 1864 provided for a Federal Union.

3. The Bill drafted by the Canadian delegates at the London Conference in 1866 also provided for a Federal Union.

4. The Colonial Office of the Imperial Parliament was not disposed to grant the Provinces of Canada their request for a Federal Union.

5. The British North America Act enacted by the Imperial Parliament carried out neither the spirit nor the terms of the Quebec Resolutions.

6. Canada did not become a Federal Union or a Confederation under the British North America Act, but rather a United Colony.
The privilege of the federation, therefore, was still a future privilege for the provinces of Canada.

7. The Parliament of Canada did not become the government of Canada, much less a federal government; it became merely the central
legislature of a United Colony, a legislative body whose only power was that of aiding and advising the Governor-General as an agent of the
Imperial Parliament.

8. The British North America Act, as enacted by the Imperial Parliament, was not a constitution but merely an act of the Imperial Parliament, which united four colonies in Canada into one colony, with the supreme authority still remaining in the hands of the British government.

9. The privilege of federating became realizable for the provinces of Canada, only through the enactment of the Statute of Westminster on December 11, 1931. Through this statute, the Imperial Parliament relinquished to the people of Canada their sovereign rights, and through them to their Provincial governments as their most direct agents.

10. Since December 11, 1931, the Provinces of Canada have not acted on their newly acquired status in the forming of a Federal Union, nor have the people of Canada ratified a constitution. Therefore, the original proposition, namely: that all power to govern in Canada resides at the moment, with the Provinces of Canada; and, that all power legally remains there until such time as the Provinces sign an agreement and ratify a constitution whereby they may delegate such powers as they wish to a central government of their own creation. In the meantime, Canada exists as ten political units without a political superior.
Should you consider that there is merit in the information, which I have given you, I would be very happy to meet with you personally to discuss in greater depth the implications of the unprecedented constitutional circumstances prevailing in Canada.

Yours for a better Canada,

Walter F. Kuhl
[Member of Parliament for Jasper-Edson, 1935-1949]


The Republic Of Alberta
Sovereignty Forever 


Wednesday, 12 August 2020

How to Create a Lawful Republic Administration (removing an Illegal de-facto Government) is to (seat a De Jure Republic) via Constitutional Convention

 How to Create a Lawful Republic Administration (removing an Illegal de-facto Government) is to seat a De Jure Republic via Constitutional Convention



How and who properly creates constitutions and sovereign  Republic Nation. It requires merely a public consensus about the purpose of the nation and how to best achieve it.

a) First, there has to be a territory (such as a province, i.e. Alberta) whose sovereigns desire to be a Sovereign Republic Nation.

b) From among themselves the Sovereigns in and throughout their respective territory create Constitutional Convention Committees (which is in the works) through out all the Nations/Provinces and Territories.  Each Committee has Sovereign's appointed  in each Constitutional Committee Conventions who communicate with other Constitutional Convention Committees through out the Territory. (which is being done in many areas throughout every province)

With internet and the advancement of technology  Constitutional Convention Committees throughout the Territory(s) of a Province with the formulation of a Constitutional Convention to create and Ratify a Constitution. This is a Constitution  of,  "We the Sovereigns for the Sovereigns by the  Sovereigns"  is how the Constitutional Conventions are being formed in every Nation/Province and Territory.

c) The Constitutional Conventions add the information from the  Sovereigns to the draft  and then  gives a draft Republic Constitution to the  Sovereigns for review and public debate, to provide an opportunity for changes.

d) After numerous public debate they work out the changes, after which it is submitted again to the Sovereigns for review and further changes, if necessary.

e) This process is repeated until the Republic Constitution has become a formula acceptable to the Sovereigns.

f) Now the Sovereigns will be able to ratify the Republic Constitution with an affirmation; to accept the Republic Constitution. 

Unify The People has a secure digital e-signature that is transparent on their website to make the process easy for all to read, input ideas, and to Ratify the Republic Constitution. 

g) If the Republic Constitutional draft cannot be achieved, further changes must be made until the Republic Constitution is acceptable to the Sovereigns.

h) The entire process is recorded and documented as proof of the Republic Constitution’s authority.

i) On the basis of the Republic Constitution an Administration is then formed, which is contractually bound (social contract) to respect it and conduct itself in accordance with it.

j) Now this Sovereign Republic Nation can form a federation with other Sovereign Nations, if it wishes to do so.

Note; that no consideration has been given to the manipulative interference from privately owned media monopolies or Law Societies i.e. the BAR.

Note; that the Republic Constitution is created first, then the administrative body and then the courts, to create a Republic Nation for the Sovereigns, by the Sovereigns, of the Sovereigns, it cannot be any other way.

Note; no foreign Nations or entity can formulate (or create) the constitution of another nation. It has to be created by the Sovereigns themselves and becomes, for all intent purposes, their protective property. It’s not only lawful  but is a contract, which subjugates the Administrative body to the Republic Sovereigns. The Administrative body  derives a limited authority to govern from it, always subject to the Sovereign’s authority.

Canadians need to be educated about Canada’s history

 

UNIFY THE PEOPLE 



Canadians need to be educated about Canada’s history – this is absolutely key if the people of the Canadian provinces have any chance of taking control of their lives and what belongs to them.

Use the FLYER  to help educate yourselves and others to the Solution. https://unifythepeople.ca/

“Unify The People web site has all the information”

To understand where we are, we must first understand how we got here…

Deep research has unearthed key events, which have both created and hidden the truth of what Canada is, and how you are governed. (Under a Dictatorship unaccountable to We The People)

Event: From the 1700s into the next century, England and France were tense partners representing both Upper and Lower Canada.

General Wolfe’s death in the final battle on the Plains of Abraham in 1759, secured victory for England, the prize ultimately known as, ‘Canada INC ’.

The Treaty of Paris joined the formerly British controlled Upper Canada with France’s Lower Canada into the French legal entity – a Corporation Sole, the ‘Province of Quebec’.

The amalgamation process from 1759 through 1763 seated the first British Governor General within that Corporation Sole, which in 1787 amalgamated all of ‘Canada’ enabling Britain to seat a Governor General to rule over the their Colonies known then as: the ‘Province of Canada’ and New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.

For 80 years between 1787 and 1867, the British placed many Governors General into the Corporation Sole. Issuing Letters Patent, the British Monarchy thereby proclaimed that Governor Generals held the ‘power’ to create and control the government of Canada, as a British Colony.

Event: Delegates from Canada had no part in drafting the British North America Act, March 29, 1867, and no certified copy of this act was brought back to to Canada by the delegates.

The Act was drafted by Lord Thring, Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury.

It is not a Constitution for it constitutes nothing.

It simply emphasizes the power of the Governor-General to appoint and remove a Privy Council to ‘aid and advise’ him and to state that the Governor-General has the power to pass an ‘order-in-council’ by himself individually as the case requires. ( An ‘order-in-council’ is equal to an Act of Parliament.)

One score and two years later the Interpretations Act, 1889, was passed, stating that Canada is a Colony.

This gives the lie to the story of Confederation and brands it as a reductio ad absurdum. ( disproof of a proposition by showing an absurdity to which it leads when carried to its logical conclusion (the carrying of something to an absurd extreme)  Another recent absurdity is that a House and Senate of British Subjects debating the adoption of a Flag and Anthem.

You say you have never heard of this before!

You are not alone in this.

The ‘Dominion of Canada’ meant the British Empire would retain their prize, the Governor General was then able to control all of Canada.

John A. MacDonald, knighted as Sir John A., was ultimately a traitor to the people he represented in Canada. Joining the British mainland colonies, they created the Dominion – Canada East, now Quebec; Canada West, now Ontario; along with New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.

Event: The year, 1868. Through their Royal Charter established in 1670 by King Charles 2nd, the privately held Hudson’s Bay Company employed land usage west of Quebec and Ontario, then known as Rupert’s Land.

In 1868, British Parliament created the ‘Rupert’s Land Act’ to allow the Hudson’s Bay Company to sell use-of-land back to the Monarch, Queen Victoria. The following year, Hudson’s Bay Company finalized the transaction by signing the “Deed of Surrender”. In 1871 Queen Victoria transferred the use of those lands to the ‘Dominion of Canada’, operated by the Governor General to settle the land and create the western provinces, the allodial title would be held by the Court in Chancery for the British Empire until 1931.

Event: The year, 1901. With Queen Victoria’s death, the repeal of Section 2 of the BNA Act came into force, deliberately leaving the Dominion of Canada without a Monarch. To this day the BNA Act repeal of Section 2 has never been re-enacted and the only Monarch it applies to is Queen Victoria.

Event: The year, 1931. British Parliament passed the ‘Statute of Westminster’ allowing their Dominions to act independently. This would allow the said Dominions to federate and create their own Constitutions.

Ireland, New Zealand, South Africa did – Canada did not.

Why didn’t Canada federate?

What does it really mean for us as “Canadians” today?

Follow the money… to learn how certain forces active even today, were determined not to surrender their cherished positions of power. Continuing by way of deception, these forces kept alive the illusion of ‘Canadian Confederation’ and ‘Sovereignty’. This deliberate illusion continued throughout various iterations of the BNA Act, later called the “Constitution Acts” of 1940, 43, 49, 60, 65, 74, 75 and finally, 1982.


Event: The year, 1946. King George VI appointed a Governor General to Canada. In 1947, he commanded the Parliament of Canada to create a commission to write Letters Patent for his Governor General, he then commanded Prime Minister Mackenzie King to sign the new “Letters Patent” on his behalf. The letters patent reference the BNA act, 1867 “Letters Patent” enabling the Governor General to give Royal assent to the Income Tax act 1948.

The Governor General sits in Ottawa and his Lieutenant Governors sit in each of the provinces – to report not to you the people, but to the “Queen in Right of Canada”. Today some statutes created by the various provincial governments or the Federal government receive Royal Accent, the positions of Lt. Governor ., GG and Queen of Canada are simply fictional figureheads with NO standing in law.

Event: 1952 the Royal Styles and Titles act is created by the Parliament of Canada for the Queen of Canada, yes that’s correct the Queen of Canada proclaims through this act, to be the Queen of Canada, not joking.

This should clear up any wonder over why at the inauguration ceremony of 2019, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and all elected members swore allegiance – hand-upon-Bible – to the Queen of Canada and not to the People of Canada. You may now have realized why.

But wait, how does this work… according to the Statutes Law Revisions Act of 1893, Section 2 of the BNA act, 1867 was repealed, so what Queen?

It’s time to discover the far-reaching impact against all of us!

Event: The year, 1982. To prevent people from discovering the illusion, Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau and his Cabinet created the ‘Canada Bill’, delivering directly to the self-styled ‘Queen of Canada’, Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, for her delivery of it to the British Parliament to thereby pass it as the “Canada Act”, 1982.

Trudeau would “patriate” the defunct BNA act 1867, to Canada – a photocopy, the original still residing in the UK Parliamentary Archives.

Upon returning, Trudeau convinced all provinces to ratify the deception of the new ‘Constitution’. This was of the utmost of importance, without the provinces ratifying this Act of a foreign parliament it could not become Supreme Law (Law of the Sea) here on the landmass commonly known as Canada. All the provinces with the exception of Quebec signed off. Their problem, the Constitution Act was NOT ratified and has NO standing here on the landmass commonly known as Canada.

The outcome of this adventure saw Trudeau retiring from politics, leaving his mess behind to be sorted out by future politicians.

To ensure the deception was laid to rest, the “Government of Canada” knew they needed to amend ‘The Constitution Act, 1982’. There was the Meech Lake Accord of 1987, followed five years later by the Charlottetown Accord. These accords failed and the “Government of Canada” did not get what it wanted.

As both Accords failed, the federal authority in 1995 let sleeping dogs lie, pretending everything was as it should be. After all, the people of Canada had yet to figure it out.

Today, Canada is not a lawfully established Sovereign Nation.

“Unify The People” is the Solution to create an accountable government for the People by The People.

These fascinating hidden truths will be revealed.

Join The Solution, plenty to learn.

Get Educated to Get Liberated.

SOVEREIGN FOREVER



AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH TO YOUR BANK

  AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH TO YOUR BANK   3 Parts to the Affidavit of Truth 1.        Listing who the grievances are and listing of your tru...