THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF
COURT
Canon 3228
A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law.
Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and
are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions
asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public
Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees,
Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt:
1. The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a
matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild
that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating
clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter
completely under private Bar Guild rules; and
2. The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have
all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the Government,
or “public officials” by making additional oaths of public office that openly and deliberately
contradict their private “superior” oaths to their own Guild. Unless openly rebuked and rejected, the
claim stands that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate public servants and therefore
trustees under public oath; and
3. The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the
capacity of “public officials” who have sworn a solemn public oath remain bound by that oath and
therefore bound to serve honestly, impartiality and fairly as dictated by their oath. Unless openly
challenged and demanded, the presumption stands that the Private Bar Guild members have
functioned under their public oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. If challenged, such
individuals must recuse themselves as having a conflict of interest and cannot possibly stand under
a public oath; and
4. The Presumption of Immunity is that key members of the Private Bar Guild in the capacity of
“public officials” acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates who have sworn a solemn public
oath in good faith are immune from personal claims of injury and liability. Unless openly
challenged and their oath demanded, the presumption stands that the members of the Private Bar
Guild as public trustees acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates are immune from any
personal accountability for their actions; and
5. The Presumption of Summons is that by custom a summons unrebutted stands and therefore
one who attends Court is presumed to accept a position (defendant, juror, witness) and jurisdiction
of the court. Attendance to court is usually invitation by summons. Unless the summons is rejected
and returned, with a copy of the rejection filed prior to choosing to visit or attend, jurisdiction and
position as the accused and the existence of “guilt” stands; and
6. The Presumption of Custody is that by custom a summons or warrant for arrest unrebutted
stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to be a thing and therefore liable to be detained in custody by “Custodians”. [This includes the dead legal fiction non-human “PERSON”
that corporate-governments rules and regulations are written for.*] Custodians may only lawfully
hold custody of property and “things” not flesh and blood soul possessing beings. Unless this
presumption is openly challenged by rejection of summons and/or at court, the presumption stands
you are a thing and property and therefore lawfully able to be kept in custody by custodians; and
7. The Presumption of Court of Guardians is the presumption that as you may be listed as a
“resident” of a ward of a local government area and have listed on your “passport” the letter P, you
are a pauper and therefore under the “Guardian” powers of the government and its agents as a
“Court of Guardians”. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a
general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands
and you are by default a pauper, and lunatic and therefore must obey the rules of the clerk of
guardians (clerk of magistrates court);
8. The Presumption of Court of Trustees is that members of the Private Bar Guild presume you
accept the office of trustee as a “public servant” and “government employee” just by attending a
Roman Court, as such Courts are always for public trustees by the rules of the Guild and the Roman
System. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to state you are merely visiting by
“invitation” to clear up the matter and you are not a government employee or public trustee in this
instance, the presumption stands and is assumed as one of the most significant reasons to claim
jurisdiction – simply because you “appeared”; and
9. The Presumption of Government acting in two roles as Executor and Beneficiary is that for the
matter at hand, the Private Bar Guild appoint the judge/magistrate in the capacity of Executor while
the Prosecutor acts in the capacity of Beneficiary of the trust for the current matter. Unless this
presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general
executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands and you are by default the
trustee, therefore must obey the rules of the executor (judge/magistrate); and
10. The Presumption of Executor De Son Tort is the presumption that if the accused does seek to
assert their right as Executor and Beneficiary over their body, mind and soul they are acting as an
Executor De Son Tort or a “false executor” challenging the “rightful” judge as Executor. Therefore,
the judge/magistrate assumes the role of “true” executor and has the right to have you arrested,
detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged
by not only asserting one’s position as Executor as well as questioning if the judge or magistrate is
seeking to act as Executor De Son Tort, the presumption stands and a judge or magistrate of the
private Bar guild may seek to assistance of bailiffs or sheriffs to assert their false claim; and
11. The Presumption of Incompetence is the presumption that you are at least ignorant of the law,
therefore incompetent to present yourself and argue properly. Therefore, the judge/magistrate as
executor has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation.
Unless this presumption is openly challenged to the fact that you know your position as executor
and beneficiary and actively rebuke and object to any contrary presumptions, then it stands by the
time of pleading that you are incompetent then the judge or magistrate can do what they need to
keep you obedient; and
12. The Presumption of Guilt is the presumption that as it is presumed to be a private business
meeting of the Bar Guild, you are guilty whether you plead “guilty”, do not plead or plead “not
guilty”. Therefore unless you either have previously prepared an affidavit of truth and motion to
dismiss with extreme prejudice onto the public record or call a demurrer, then the presumption is
you are guilty and the private Bar Guild can hold you until a bond is prepared to guarantee the
amount the guild wants to profit from you.
Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240
Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344
Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca
No comments:
Post a Comment