Common law being Bull Shi'ite and this is the reason why;
The common law of England were the laws common to the Heptarchy (7 kingdoms) ...
At 1213 with the stroke of the quill King John LACKLAND, "Lackland" as it owned no land, gave England and Ireland over to pope (inc) ... at that time the laws common to the Heptarchy came under the constitution written in Heaven via the Vulgar ByBull of pope (inc) only to be transferred to the code of cana'an law at Chapter 13 Part I of Magma Carta ...
Either at 1213 or 1302 the "LORD" is pope ergo the Lords Spiritual, Lords Temporal and Commons is, in reality, the Lord's spiritual, Lord's temporal as pope (inc) claim to be have the spiritual and temporal swords ergo Lord apostrophe s Spiritual Lords apostrophe s Temporal ... yes, England became an Ecclesiocracy ... They have "Ministers" ... what is a Minister but an Ecclesiast! The military go on "missions" making them "missionaries" .... hidden in plain sight ...
Back to Magma Carta 1215 seems 25 Barons with Pandulf and Langdon (ecclesiasts) had a beef with King John (the pope's man ... see King John by Shakespeare) while on pope's land ... hmmmm .... IMAX time! Chapter 13 contains 2 parts: the city of Londinium with its ANCIENT customs and the other cities, towns and ports with there NOT ANCIENT customs ... customs dating back 1.5 years or 1213 ....
pope (inc) are the Esauites aka IDOMean aka "Jews" while Vatican, with it's code of Cana'an law, sodomy and pedophilia are Hittite-Money/military power then/now ... Esau and Cana'an joined up at Genesis 36:2 ... the Muslim is also an Esauite at Genesis 36:3 ...
you can read up on this from J. R. Green's History of the English People ...
ANTISEMITIC ANTI-MASKER ARRESTED WITH 65 ILLEGAL GUNS, $18 MILLION IN STREET DRUGS
Suspect in Toronto Police’s largest ever single-day firearms and narcotics bust was a COVID-conspiracist and antisemite who exaggerated credentials as a holistic therapist.
On December 16th, the Toronto Police Service issued apress release detailing what they called their “biggest single-day drug and firearm seizure” with Daniel Dubajic as the target.
A November raid of Dubajic’s Etobicoke apartment included over 100 kilograms of cocaine, more than 60 kg of meth, roughly 15,000 rounds of ammunition, and a grand total of 65 firearms — six of which were loaded at the time of seizure.
None of the firearms seized were possessed legally. Police estimate the value of drugs seized to beover $18 million.
ANTISEMITISM, HATE PROMOTION AND CONSPIRACY THEORIES
Daniel Dubajic has shared support for the claim on Facebook, saying that “everyone who thinks Biden won is a fake news sheep,” and calling Biden’s electoral vote count “fake news” in comments made on Nov. 13.
Source: Facebook
The conspiracy theory is often cited along with others under the large web of QAnon, including the antisemitic trope that Jewish philanthropist George Soros is installing a “new world order” with a “shadow government,” which Dubajic has also spread on his Facebook page.
He alleged “They (Jews) think they are the chosen ones. They believe they are entitled to rule the world. That’s no conspiracy. That’s common sense.” In another comment he stated, “Hitler was also voted man of the year for the world. Look it up. Maybe even twice,” a likely reference to TIME Magazine’s 1938 Man of The Year designation, which was decided to be Hitler because of his prominence in the 1938 news cycle.
Source: Facebook
In June of last year, Dubajic wrote that George Soros created the Black Lives Matter movement in order to start race wars, claiming “George Soros funds the Democratic Party. The same guy who created and funded BLM to intentionally incite race wars."
In the same post, he also affirmed belief in Pizzagate, a QAnon linked conspiracy that led to a man storming a restaurant in DC with an assault rifle in 2017. Dubajic has also shared posts including "#saveourchildren," a QAnon associated slogan.
Source: Facebook
CANADA’S ANTI-MASK COMMUNITY
Following the arrest, some Twitter users were quick to point out Daniel Dubajic’s membership in the Toronto COVID conspiracy organization Moms Against Distancing. MAD is an organization that’s goals have included the creation of an unregistered anti-mask community school with no social distancing mandates, no mask mandates, and a staff ofvolunteer teachers without proper qualifications.
Source: Facebook
When asked for a statement, Chris Saccoccia (who often goes by Chris Sky), the founder of Moms Against Distancing, commented, “I don’t know him. He has no involvement with me or MAD.”
Chris emphasized MAD’s relatively open doors, saying, “it’s a private group where anybody can join,” and added, “Any attempt to connect this man to me or my non-profit is nothing but slander, defamation and lies.”
Prior to his arrest, Dubajic was vocal about his beliefs surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic on social media. Dubajic has described himself as “anti-mask”, and has shared content on Facebook echoing strong skepticism of the reality of viruses. In September he shared posts alleging that “a virus simply does not exist”, and that viruses “are not the cause of disease.”
Source: Facebook
In one comment to a friend, he states that although he knew people who claimed to have contracted the virus, he was skeptical that they hadn’t just gotten “the flu.”
Source: Facebook
HOLISTIC MEDICINE
In recent years, Daniel Dubajic worked as anaura therapist. According to one of his repeat clients, he would use techniques that involved touching a patient’s ‘aura’ — the area surrounding a person, without physically touching their body. The client described Dubajic’s presentation as that of a “healing guru”.
On his Facebook page, Dubajic listed his most recent occupation as a Healer atAccess Consciousness, a holistic therapy company with practitioners around the world and offices in Australia, Ireland, and the United States.
However, according to a media representative from Access Consciousness, Dubajic was “not an instructor nor a teacher in any way at all.” Access Consciousness said in no uncertain terms that “he (Daniel Dubajic) is not involved with our organization.”
Last year, Netflix series The Goop Labs featured an episode about “energy healing” that included New Age aura therapy techniques. The episode was the subject of controversy, as several studies have indicated techniques like the ones used on The Goop Labs areonly effective as placebos.
Unproven holistic medical practises like aura healing play a key role in Canada’s anti-vaccine and anti-mask movements. Vaccine Choice Canada, the country’s largest anti-vaccine organization, was a major presence early on at Canadian anti-mask rallies along with partnered organizationslike Moms Against Distancing.
Vaccine Choice Canada frequently cites holistic medicines as alternatives to the use of COVID-19 vaccines. In an article fromVaccine Choice Canada’s resources page, they urge “the use of homeopathic remedies for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 symptoms.” The article also mentions preventing fighting the virus by exhibiting “positive emotions”, avoiding sugar, and avoiding seasonal flu shots, alleging that “the influenza vaccine can increase the risk of infection by other non-influenza respiratory viruses”.
Vaccine Choice Canada currently has over 16 thousand fans on Facebook and 25 thousand Instagram followers.
Daniel Dubajic has also affirmed confidence in holistic medical practices to combat COVID-19. In September he shared an infographic from anti-vaccine advocate Jodie Meschuk stating that “children and anyone healthy are extremely resilient and natural exposure to viruses helps build an even stronger immunity.” He has shared posts stating “vaccines are poison,” and “you will never meet someone that has truly researched vaccines and still vaccinates.”
Source: Facebook
Since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the anti-mask movement in Canada has been growing not only in size, but also in the volume of their actions. Calls for violence are becoming increasingly common. The suspected trafficking of illegal firearms involving an antisemitic covid conspiracist should be cause for concern.
On January 5, two suspects in Dawson Creek, British Columbia were charged with assault after restraining and repeatedly punching a Walmart employee who asked them to wear face masks while shopping in November.
Recently, a pharmacist who destroyed 570 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in Wisconsin admitted that he was motivated byconspiracy theories about the vaccine.
Over the last 20 years or so, Rocco Galati has tried to project himself as a constitutional lawyer, fighting for the interests of Canadians, and humanity as a whole. However, looking more into it, I’ve come to believe that this image and persona are entirely artificial. I think he’s actively working against Canadians.
Since this will almost certainly result in more threats, a little disclaimer is needed. This is based on information readily available, and also, there is no intent to mislead or deceive. Given the circumstances we face, truth becomes even more important. Keep in mind, the Ontario Libel and Slander Act contains many built-in defenses for writers and publishers. Furthermore, anti-SLAPP laws prevent people from suing simply to shut another person up.
For extra information, Overdue Revolutions wrote a detailed article on July 17, 2020, outlining many of the same concerns. It is well worth a read, as is the overall “resistance” to Trudeau being controlled. One point the first article was spot on about predicted that Galati “appearing” to challenge Trudeau in the July 6 lawsuit would convince others that it was all taken care of — and that any outcome can be manufactured. However, the plan seems to be to leave it in limbo, at least for now.
Now, getting to the heart of the matter:
As a starting point, it’s a little strange that a person who claims to be censored is in the Canadian media so often. CBC has hosted Galati countless times over the years. True threats to the establishment aren’t given airtime on the national news.
It’s also curious to note that the CBC never threw Galati under the bus over that bogus July 6 lawsuit. Sure, they did a half hearted piece about how this poorly written, and rambling document was likely to be dismissed. And it would have been. However, they could have done so much more damage if they reported that it was still sitting a year later. Then again, lawyers for Trudeau, Tam, Ford, etc…. could have exposed this. It’s been covered many times on Canuck Law. Have to wonder when the “establishment” media and politicians protect the “resistance” lawyer who’s taking them to task.
1. Comments Like This Never Questioned By The Public
Video Player
00:00
00:59
This video is a clip from a January 2015 interview, posted in February (see 10:45). Apparently, there are too many white men on benches, and this “white supremacist” system is appalling. The topic wasn’t relevant to the issue of banking practices in Canada, or the COMER case, but the contempt and disgust spills out anyway. In fairness, this was 6 years ago, but is there anything to indicate his views have changed at all?
Have to say, this rant comes across as pretty racist. Can you imagine if those remarks were directed at another group? Also, it was an interview, intended to be aired, not things said at a private event.
2. Representing Assets, Strange Cases
The law is a very broad field, and a lawyer will encounter many types of clients and cases in their careers. However, here are a few that might make people take notice, as they are unusual:
Galati represented Abdurahman Khadr in 2003, a suspected terrorist who was brought back to Canada. Khadr claimed to be a CIA informant, making his representation by Galati very odd. After all, this was a lawyer who prided himself on working against the Government.
Another noteworthy client was Delmart Vreeland, supposedly a Naval Intelligence Officer. He was arrested in 2000. Vreeland claimed to have information about upcoming attacks that needed to be prevented.
Galati challenged the appointments of 2 Justices: Marc Nadon (Supreme Court of Canada); and Robert Mainville (Quebec Court of Appeal). What motivated these, and was there was som
e client behind the scenes? Also, getting paid for the Nadon case must have been important, given the applications to the Federal Court, Federal Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court of Canada.
3. Bank Of Canada, COMER Canada Infrastructure Bank
COMER, the Committee on Monetary & Economic Reform, sued the Federal Government in 2011. On paper, this seemed a noble and worthwhile goal, although there may be more than meets the eye. Overdue Revolution covers it pretty well, including the founders of the organization. Strange how the Canadian Infrastructure Bank seemed to rise from the ashes of this case. It’s an organization handing out money for construction and development, and is even less accountable than the Bank of Canada.
The other consequence of losing the Bank of Canada case means that any future challenge to the banking system will be next to impossible. Read into that what you will.
Now, Rob Carbone, of the fake “Republican Party of Canada”, claims to own the Canada Infrastructure Bank. He hangs around the protests a lot, pretending to be a wealthy businessman, larping as a billionaire, apparently with access to trillions of dollars in assets. Supposedly, Chris Saccoccia is planning to become Finance Minister one day. The entire story is nonsense.
4. Citizenship For Convicted Terrorists/Traitors
June 25, 2014, Galati and Manuel Azevedo sued the Governor General of Canada, the Attorney General of Canada, and the Immigration Minister. This was to stop Bill C-24, which would have stripped the dual nationals of their Canadian citizenship if convicted of terrorism or treason. This has nothing to do with guilt or innocence, but letting monsters enjoy rights they don’t deserve.
Curiously, Galati and Azevedo tried to use their own dual citizenships (Italian and Portuguese respectively), in order to gain private interest standing. On January 22, 2015, the Application was dismissed by the Federal Court. An appeal was filed (File #A-52-15).
It would have been nice to know who was really behind this challenge. Presumably, Galati and Azevedo are busy lawyers with a lot to do. A bewildering choice, unless there was someone behind the scenes, directing the action. Could they have picked a less deserving class of people?
After Trudeau took office in late 2015, Bill C-6 was one of the first pieces of legislation introduced. Hearings began in April 2016. The Bill passed, making the Appeal moot, and it was formally discontinued in September 2018.
One of Galati’s clients in 2006 was Ahmad Mustafa Ghany, who was (allegedly) one of the Toronto 18 suspects. The charges against him were eventually stayed. The ringleader, Zakaria Amara, was scheduled to have his Canadian citizenship stripped away following his conviction and life sentence. However, he won’t now. Just a thought, but this may be the real reason (at least in part), why Galati and Azevedo challenged Bill C-24.
True, everyone has the right to representation, even accused terrorists. That being said, this is a bizarre way for these lawyers to become household names.
5. The Boyle & Khadr Families
In 2003, Galati worked to secure the release of Abdurahman Khadr, older brother of Omar Khadr. He was being held on suspicion of terrorism. Supposedly, he “implored the public earlier this week to not judge him since he did not face any charges while in American custody for the past two years. But at the same press conference, Khadr later admitted that in the summer of 1998 he attended a notorious training camp in Afghanistan, which Osama bin Laden is rumoured to have visited.”
This is not to imply that Galati is involved in terrorism, but again, it’s certainly unusual for a tax lawyer to take this path. Of all the areas of law that are out there, why is a person drawn to terrorism cases? However, there would later be new ties to the Khadr Family revealed.
If your wife is pregnant, taking her backpacking through a warzone in Afghanistan isn’t really the best idea. But that’s what Joshua Boyle supposedly did. Allegedly, they were kidnapped in 2012 and held prisoner for 5 years. However, they had 3 children in the meantime, making their “captors” some of the nicest people imaginable. The story is farfetched, to put it very mildly.
On December 19, 2017, photographs were posted of a meeting meeting between Trudeau and the Boyles. Now, people can’t just get in to see the Prime Minister, as they would have to be cleared by the RCMP. Interesting, that Trudeau didn’t see him as a threat. Interesting, to have a Twitter account with the name BoylesVsWorld.
Boyle used to be married to Zaynab Khadr, making him the former brother-in-law of Omar Khadr. This is the convicted terrorist who attacked the American army and was captured in 2002 in Afghanistan. Khadr became a multimillionaire as a result of a lawsuit years later. Trudeau handed over $10.5 million of taxpayer money, without putting up any real resistance.
Boyle was later charged with 19 offenses, including assault, sexual assault, and forcible confinement. He was acquitted by the Judge.
As a bit of an aside, Joshua’s father, Patrick Boyle, was a connected Judge with the Federal Court, in the tax department. Galati got his start in law working with the Government as a tax lawyer. But that’s probably a coincidence.
While the above sections related to past and historical information, let’s look at something more recent: the so-called challenges to the medical martial law imposed by various Governments.
6. Controlled Opposition To Lockdowns In Canadian Courts
In December 2020, Galati filed a defamation suit against a bunch of people and a few media outlets over comments and publications involving Kulvinder Gill and Ashvinder Lamba, (file #CV-20-00652918-0000)
While touted as being a way to fight back against censorship of doctors, this does no such thing. Instead, it sues a variety of people and organizations over mean words. And suing private individuals won’t result in policy changes. Looking at the statement of claim, we can see what exactly it being sought. Quoting pages 5 and 6:
With respect to Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill: . (a) General damages as against the Defendants, as follows: (i) As against the personal defendants, jointly ad severally, $4,000,000.00 for express libel and slander and by innuendo and irresponsible publication; (ii) As against the print publication defendants, The Pointer, Societe Radio-Canada, and the Hamilton Spectator, $750,000. For libel and negligence; (b) Aggravated damages as against the Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $1,000,000; (c) Punitive damages as against the Defendants, jointly, and severally, in the amount of $1,000,000; (d) An interim and permanent injunction requiring the retraction, removal, and prominent apology for any and all defamatory publication and/or remarks by the Defendants; (e) Prejudgement interest pursuant to s. 128 of the Courts of Justice Act R.S.O. 1990 c. C43; and (f) Costs of this action on a substantial indemnity basis and such further or further relief as this Court deems just.
With respect to Dr. Ashvinder Kaur Lamba: . (a) General damages as against the Defendants, Dr. Angus Maciver and Dr. Nadia Alam, as follows: (i) As against the person defendants, jointly and severally, $4,000,000.00 for express libel and slander and by innuendo and irresponsible publication. (b) Aggravated damages as against the Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $1,000,000; (c) Punitive damages as against the Defendants, jointly, and severally, in the amount of $1,000,000; (d) An interim and permanent injunction requiring the retraction, removal, and prominent apology for any and all defamatory publication and/or remarks by the Defendants; (e) Prejudgement interest pursuant to s. 128 of the Courts of Justice Act R.S.O. 1990 c. C43; and (f) Costs of this action on a substantial indemnity basis and such further or further relief as this Court deems just.
Even if this lawsuit is successful, nothing will change in the big picture. Sure, Gill and Lamba may become millionaires in the process, and apologies might have to be issued. That said, lockdown regulations and policies will not be impacted in the slightest.
To everyone donating to the Constitutional Rights Centre, you will never see a penny of this money. You’re just subsidizing private litigation.
Looking up the case online, it seems that many defendants don’t have lawyers. However, in situations like this, it’s fairly common to pool funds to have a single lawyer represent multiple people. According to the records, the next scheduled appearance is September 27, 2021.
Feel free to read the Statement of Claim, which is publicly available. The 2 Plaintiffs are seeking at least $12.75 million, over rude tweets and publications.
Just a personal take, while distasteful comments were made, these are hardly worth suing over, and don’t merit such an action. Even taking everything at face value, this is not $13 million in damages. And such a claim would probably be thrown out if a SLAPP Motion (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) were filed. And again, even if the Plaintiffs won, it would create no policy changes whatsoever.
As for the comments that Gill goes around blocking people, there is a high degree of truth to that. Besides, how can a person sue another for commenting on someone else’s blocking rates? Rempel may still be on top, but she’s facing some competition.
A source close to this mentioned that depositions took place in July. That’s interesting the case is moving ahead, considering how insignificant it really is.
A private defamation gets Galati’s attention, but these don’t. It’s been addressed repeatedly on this site how 2 claims by Vaccine Choice Canada remain in limbo. One is from October 2019 and involves mandatory vaccination of Ontario students (CV-19-00629801-0000). Another is the infamous one from July 2020, which would end all measures completely, (CV-20-00643451-0000). Supposedly, a group called Action4Canada will be filing a lawsuit in B.C., but hasn’t, even after fundraising for a year.
What litigation people pursue privately is their business. When one repeatedly asks for money to support litigation, it becomes everyone’s business.
There have been rumours circulating that there are all these Affidavits ready to drop on Trudeau and his cronies, and it’s all coming together. Thousands of pages of evidence is about to be submitted, and the Courts will fix it all. Basically, trust the plan. Don’t worry, there is a major effort behind the scenes, and everything is being taken care of.
[1] Diligently push a case that impacts nothing long term. [2] Let potentially groundbreaking cases remain idle.
The Defendants in the July 6, 2020 case (excluding Windsor-Essex Country and their CMOH) haven’t even bothered to lawyer up. And no attempt was made to force a default judgement. A cynic may wonder if there was collusion involved, an agreement by all parties to do nothing. The Statement of Claim was written up in such a piss poor manner — and maybe that was deliberate — that it would be struck by any challenge filed. Considering that the Claim alleges serious human rights violations, it seems odd to be worth only $11 million, far less than the defamation case.
Considering that the real cases (again, publicly funded) are going nowhere, how exactly can Galati justify spending his time patrolling Twitter, dropping Section 5 threats, and then start suing nobodies?
One could argue that this is just a convoluted strategy, or that there is some grand plan. However, this looks like an effort to “appear” to be fighting against the Trudeau/Ford agenda, while ensuring that it continues. In short, this seems to be an attempt to neutralize real opposition.
Interesting side note on the Sgt. Julie Evans case: the Attorney General used Rule 2.1.01 to try to get the case dismissed. This is the Police on Guard for Thee. However, it’s meant for very obviously defective cases. If the AG was serious about this, why not use a regular Motion to Strike? Was the goal to launch a half hearted effort to make it appear to challenge the case?
While claiming to be opposed to Trudeau, and the medical martial law measures, Galati’s law firm has been receiving CEWS, the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy. Check the link out. Pretty hard to be against the system when the system is subsidizing your office. Although it doesn’t say the total amount, it could be substantial, given the expenses law firms can incur.
8. Selling Basic Information To Self Represented Litigants
Video Player
00:00
09:50
This offer no longer appears to be available, but it was in late Fall 2020. For the low, low rate of just $90, you could purchase half filled Court forms to sue businesses and the Government. Of course, it came with the disclaimer that this didn’t mean you were represented, and that Galati and Co. were indemnified from any consequences. This meant the lawyers assumed no responsibility, no matter what ultimately happened. This is pretty much the safety that vaccine manufacturers enjoy. People would literally be sold the rope to hang themselves with, and the lawyers drafting the papers are laughing all the way to the bank.
Just a hunch, but perhaps this product was stopped because it was a liability. The Law Society of Ontario may view this as selling legal advice, regardless of whatever disclaimers were added. We see more of the same pattern with these legal challenges:
[1] Divert attention with relatively minor matters. [2] Ensure the big cases never move ahead.
Sure, desperate people could purchase these forms if they wish, and some will buy anything. Now, where does the money from these purchases go? Where does all of the donations for the “lawsuits” go? Unfortunately, too few people ask those difficult questions. This isn’t something where you can just write a cheque and forget about.
Just like with the Gill/Lamba suit, such claims against private parties will not result in any public policy changes. Sure, some will win their cases, but it doesn’t mean the Provincial dictates suddenly become void. There will be no lasting effects outside of individual claims.
Now, had some basic informational videos (not advice) been posted instead to let Canadians know of their options, that would have been a really stand up thing to do. However, this comes across as pretty scummy.
9. Controlled Opposition To Lockdowns In Canada
It’s typically wrong to judge people by the company the keep. However, in this case it’s relevant. Beyond the Courts, the psy-op is preserved by managing and controlling the protests against these measures. Many of the people leading them come across as grifters and subversion agents, while others present as intelligence operatives. After a bit of searching, it becomes clear that it’s the same group of people running everything. Let’s take a quick look.
As addressed earlier, it seems that the anti-lockdown political efforts aren’t a real solution. People like Maxime Bernier claim to support freedom, but will never talk about the experimental nature of these “vaccines” being pushed on children. Likewise, a party that cannot put together a basic structure in 3 years should not be taken seriously. This principle also applies to the Republican Party (Carbone), New Blue Ontario (Karahalios), and Maverick/WExit (Hill), who have each had a year or more. None of them even have an internal constitution, effectively making them dictatorships. Rob Carbone, of course, supposedly is in control of the Canada Infrastructure Bank.
You also have to question the thinking of those promoting the rise of unelected people. Yes, traditional parties have failed. So let’s get rid of that, and install someone not chosen by his people, and not restricted by any constitution or governing documents. If you want to save Canada, get rid of democracy. It’s absurd, trading one set of tyrants for another.
Even so-called renegade politicians like Roman Baber and Randy Hillier will only go part way. They’ll complain that these measures are heavy handed, but never call out the medical fraud for what it is. They feed “hopium” to the masses, trying to delude others into believing a political solution is possible.
Kelly Ann Wolfe has been one of the prominent voices from the beginning. However, she has asked (or claims to have asked) the Canadian Military to intervene, and is in talks with the U.S. Armed Forces See 18:30 in the video. Strange how she can openly call for the Government to be overthrown, but is allowed to speak openly. Not a peep from anyone here. You’d think that Wolfe calling for a military dictatorship would be a cause for concern, but apparently not.
Think these groups don’t all run in the same circles? They do. Wolfe is just one of them, and it’s pretty chilling that such a person is so intertwined in the “resistance”. Think of this as a corporate empire, where the different logos are used to camouflage the fact that the companies all have the same owners.
Considering the “Fed vibes” that Wolfe gives off, it’s fair to ask to what degree these protests are used as a way to monitor citizens. Why are these people leading the opposition? Because they’re ensuring that things go nowhere, following the wisdom of Vladimir Lenin.
Patrick King claims to have attended Bilderberg, which is interesting. He doesn’t really come across as an investigative reporter. King is a co-Founder of the WExit Party (now Maverick), which makes it clear it doesn’t actually oppose the lockdowns the Provinces push. He’s also part of the Yellow Vests.
Vladislav Sobolev used the “pandemic” as an opportunity to start up a clothing line with his company, Hugs Over Masks. Yes, global tyranny is here, but let’s make some quick money selling sweaters and T-shirts. One of the reasons protests fizzled out is that people like Sobolev were simply using them as an opportunity to make money. Now, are these grifters were just in it for profit, or was there a deliberate attempt to drive away real support?
Chris Saccoccia, a.k.a. Chris Sky, came out of nowhere to emerge as the “freedom fighter” for Canada. While he does say a lot of truthful things, his behaviour and appearance are a complete turnoff to normies. Maybe that was the point of selecting him, to make resisters seem like crazies. In fact, it would be difficult to hand pick a better choice. He also started a GoFundMe, and has a (defunct?) business. There’s also this site, Mothers Against Distancing, or MAD, which is pretty sparse. Of course, he doesn’t really need to work, since his father, Art Saccoccia, is a wealthy developer.
Sky also got himself arrested for (allegedly) threatening to kill Doug Ford. The story goes that Rob Carbone turned him in — or made it up — after their relationship soured. While this may be legitimate, it comes across as a psy-op to give the police an excuse to crack down even harder on peaceful demonstrators.
Video Player
00:00
02:18
The clip came from Wolfish, and is of Lamont Daigle of The Line. From this, it comes across in a creepy way. Beyond that, this “organic” group is part of an international chain, and seems to support violence to achieve its goals. Wolfish did a great piece on organization. It’s unclear if this really is an Antifa style outfit, or is just Feds pretending to be.
It was since brought to the attention of this site that the clip is actually part of a larger interview, related to the screening of the film “Jesus Meets The Gay Man“. The clip from the above video (from Wolfish) starts at about 3:10 in the full interview. Granted, it talks about someone else in his life being a pedophile, but he appears to be sympathetic about it. The shorter clip doesn’t seem to be taking what was said in the interview out of context. Yes, it’s all on the subject of forgiveness and understanding, but rather offputting here.
In any event, go read the article on The Line, and its more eyebrow raising aspects. It’s a long one, but well worth the time.
Hanging out with these people seems like a good way to end up on a watchlist, or at least get bamboozled into buying useless junk. It’s best to not get involved with them.
Odessa Orlewicz (or is it Munroe?) was an actress about 20 years ago. She was in a few films, including Freddy vs. Jason. She promotes the grifting of Action4Canada and Vaccine Choice Canada. Her husband, Norbert, went to Langara College to study theatre. He has a formal education in acting, which should set off alarms. Are these 2 even married, or is that just a cover story they use?
In fact, a lot of the people involved seem to be performers as well. Check out their IMDb page. Maxime Bernier, James Coates, Lamont Daigle, Len Faul, Galati, Artur Pawlowski, Adam Skelly and many others all have roles in the series. Is this all just some grand production? At times it seems like it. They recently discarded Chris Sky from the cast, and perhaps Patrick King will take up the role.
Seriously, had anyone heard of many of these “freedom fighters” prior to the Spring of 2020? They all know each other, and it seems to have been the case prior to these lockdowns.
A couple exceptions: Ezra has been around writing for years in a variety of publications. Carpay has been with the JCCF a long time, which has launched challenges against a variety of measures. So it was unfair to lump them in with newcomers. (correction from original)
There is more, but overall, the entire “opposition” movement seems designed to subvert real challenges, and deter Canadians from banding together for mutual interests. While it could be dismissed as a few bad apples, it appears too coordinated. This looks like an effort to pretend to oppose martial law, while ensuring it continues on. The Court aspect is important, but it’s part of a larger agenda.
Anyhow, these are some thoughts on why I believe Galati acts as a form of controlled opposition to the Government. I don’t buy the crafted persona he sells to the public. Aside from the company he keeps, how are any of the cases he takes beneficial to Canadians? How is endless fundraisers with Vaccine Choice Canada or Action4Canada productive, when they don’t result in anything? With all of the information presented, does he really have the public’s interests at heart?
