NATURAL LAW VS. COMMON LAW: WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE?
Court of Ages, clearly and simply showing the differences between common law and natural law.
Many people think going back to common law in the courts is the solution to our current problem in the corporate court arena, but when you note the differences between common law and natural law, which is coming soon when you educate yourself from this site you will see that natural law strips the hierarchies out of the system down to the immeasurable power behind it: the Sovereigns.
English Common Law
A form of private law that governs relationships between individuals inclusive of Law of Contracts, Law of Torts, and Civil Law (labor law, commercial law, corporate law).
Based on precedent (prior decisions of formal courts and judges); past time-space.
Hierarchical (judges are deemed authority figures).
Judges are holders of an office as a career and are often viewed as politicians.
Lower courts are subject to higher court decisions. State or federal judges often rule on cases from outside their own community.
A court is a permanent institution set up and operated by the government.
Natural Law
Governs all life; is determined by nature and thus, universal.
Based on Sovereigns sensibilities in present-moment time-space.
Non-hierarchical (Adjudicators carry no real authority).
Adjudicators are to serve on a case-by-case basis and agreed upon by both parties in a dispute.
Resolution remains in the local community. Adjudicators are respected community members.
A court is a group of community members who come together for the express purpose of assisting in resolving a dispute. Members of the court are selected by the community and agreed upon by both parties in the dispute; members are only for the duration of the particular case for which they are assembled.
Here are some differences between a Common Law Grand Jury and a Natural Law Grand Jury:
Common Law Grand Jury
All grand juries abide by a same set of prescribed rules.
Jurors must agree to prescribe to written laws or decrees such as the Magna Carta or Bill of Rights.
There must be at least 25 jurors.
Jurors are required to swear or promise to uphold the grand jury rules.
All decisions are made by majority vote.
No decision of a grand jury is review-able in any court of the government.
Jurisdiction includes any government transgression, breaking of articles of peace or security, and anyone abused by the government.
Grand juries investigate potential crimes and come to a decision to indict or not indict by issuing a “true bill” or “no true bill.”
Grand jury decisions stand as law.
Natural Law Grand Jury
Grand jury guidelines may vary according to the requirements of each community.
Jurors are required to verbally affirm to execute their duties honorably.
There should be 12 jurors.
Decisions are made by unanimous vote.
Grand jury decisions are final.
Jurisdiction is whatever the parties in dispute decide upon.
Grand juries investigate evidence of crimes and come to a verdict and the sentence to the crime.
Grand jury decisions stand as law.
You’ve probably never heard of the “Free North Patriots”
before, but in only two weeks, the group seemingly appeared out of thin
air to organize several protests in cities across Canada against the
COVID-19 lockdown.
“They are breaking the law and putting everyone in jeopardy,” Ford said.
Free North Patriots
But it’s tricky figuring out who the “Free North Patriots” really are
and what they’re really up to — the group’s responses to questions
contain numerous inconsistencies and their leader operates under
multiple names.
FNP’s website and social media accounts list no names and count only a
small handful of followers. In fact, the group’s website, Facebook page
and a private Facebook group were all created on April 12.
Barely a week later, the group began promoting “peaceful protests” in
cities across Canada that would go on to be shared hundreds and
hundreds of times.
Facebook
FNP calls itself a “civil liberties” group and claims to represent “business owners.” They say their members “conduct local meetings, fundraising, peaceful protests and discuss relevant issues.”
“We just saw the need that all the people are posting random opinion
on random social media groups and they lacked structure,” an anonymous
group member who answered an e-mail sent to their website told PressProgress.
“Our aim was to provide the structure and communication.”
Several FNP members identified a man named Michael Boutros as the
group’s founder, lead organizer and creator of its website and social
media accounts, although a glance at his social media activity raises
several red flags.
Facebook
Boutros’ Facebook profile consists largely of Canadian-themed stock
imagery yet he’s connected with individuals in Africa and the
Philippines who don’t appear to speak English and have no apparent
connection to Canada. But he insists there is nothing suspicious about
that.
“I don’t have any followers on my profile that I know,” Boutros told PressProgress.
“Ever since I start, yes, the Facebook group, everyone is adding me,”
he explained. “People I don’t know and random people … I have no
interest in Facebook really.”
Boutros told PressProgress he “operates” a private security
agency “specializing in lawful interactions and tactics” and “close
proximity security,” but added that “most of the work is overseas.”
The Vancouver resident declined to provide the name of his company or his clients, but PressProgress independently confirmed he’s associated with a Scarborough company registered under the name “GCT Security and Investigations.”
That company, which advertises government-regulated training programs for private security guards and private investigators, has operated under several different names and websites in recent years.
(Ontario’s Ministry of the Solicitor General looked into the company’s license after being contacted by PressProgress.
Nearly a week after this story was first published, a ministry
spokesperson confirmed the company is a licensed training operator, but
its name was only added to an official list of licensed training providers
three days after publication. The company previously said they “100%
have an agency license,” but refused to disclose their license number).
Logos of GCT Tactical and the Free North Patriots (Facebook)
Other members of Free North Patriots admit they have never actually
physically met the man who is organizing their anti-lockdown protests.
Kyle Jefferson, one of the group’s Facebook admins, told PressProgress
he first got involved in the group a few weeks ago after stumbling
across the Facebook page and exchanging e-mails with Boutros.
Jefferson said Boutros “seems honest, but you can’t trust anyone these days.”
Another admin named Aaron said he’s only been involved with the group
for a few weeks and believes Boutros is an “interesting” and “very
cultured” person.
“We have not met in person,” Aaron said. “We have had quite lengthy
conversations though. I know him better than I know many people I have
met in person.”
Aaron, whose Facebook profile features images of his young children
alongside text criticizing “mandatory vaccines,” said he first learned
of FNP through another Facebook group he’s involved with.
Boutros claims he does “not hold any political views,” but his
activity on Facebook shows he’s actively promoted his anti-lockdown
protests in Facebook groups linked to conspiracy theories and far-right
politics, such as Yellow Vests Canada.
“Joining social media profiles like the Yellow Vest does not indicate
my support,” Boutros said. “It is simply an avenue to promote our plans
as effectively as possible to as many Canadian citizens as possible.”
Facebook
Boutros is quick to distance his group from supporters of conspiracy theories about an imagined connection between COVID-19 and 5G cell phone towers, insisting that their “views do not match ours.”
However, Boutros has also promoted a company that sells a special
bracelet for $115 that is designed to block 5G signals from entering the
human body.
The website 5Gblocker.ca states it is run by “GCT Group, a security & safety agency located in Toronto, Canada” and shares the same address as GCT Security and Investigations.
Sharon Trickett, the legal owner of “GCT Security and
Investigations,” did not deny that she and Boutros were behind the 5G
bracelet company: “All the information you need is on the 5Gblocker
website. Nothing more I can add to that,” Trickett said.
The 5G bracelet is identical
to one sold by a Nevada-based company called AlphaBio Centrix, who said
they had never heard of GCT Group and never authorized them to sell
their 5G Blocker bracelet.
“AlphaBio Centrix, R&D is the original designer and inventor of the 5G Bracelets,” CEO Richard Eaton told PressProgress. “We designed the products and had them manufactured for us, per our specifications, and photographed for online sales.”
“I was not aware of this company,” he added. “I will have our attorney look into this.”
5GBlocker.ca
Nearly 20 minutes after PressProgress contacted GCT Security
and Investigations, Boutros suddenly changed his Facebook name to “Tony
Anderson” and posted on his page that he works for a private bodyguard
agency called “InSafe.”
Less than 30 minutes later, Boutros deleted that post and posted that he worked for a different company called “Cube Security.”
Several people connected to Free North Patriots or GCT Security and
Investigations were unable to confirm Boutros was a real person, other
than Trickett who said she has “met Michael in person, but not very
often.”
She said she “hired Michael Boutros for his expertise” on a
“temporary” contract to help with “several different companies and
training platforms” that she runs.
“Michael Boutros’ personal life is in no way associated with any of my companies or my business associates,” Trickett told PressPorgress.
Despite numerous questions about his true identity, Boutros’ supporters insist that “the citizens of Canada are behind them.”
Aaron, one of FNP’s Facebook admins, told PressProgress he
sees no irony in the fact that he appears more skeptical of vaccines
than he is of a man he met two weeks ago online who operates under
multiple names.
“I am skeptical of all things … A critical mind
does not stop asking questions,” Aaron replied, before declining to
answer further questions.
Facebook
Update: Following publication of this
story, Ontario’s Ministry of the Solicitor General confirmed the company
”GCT Security and Investigations” is indeed a licensed training agency,
however, a ministry spokesperson noted the company was only formally
listed on May 1, 2020 — three days after this story was first published.
The spokesperson said their listings are generally updated ”15
days” after a company’s application for a license is approved. The
spokesperson also noted other names the company advertises services
under, including “Guard Courses” and “Ontario Security & PI License
Centre,” are not listed as registered training agencies.
“A licensed agency advertising training services under
multiple names is not required to register their marketing brands under
the Private Security and Investigative Services Act but they are
encouraged to voluntarily register their other marketing brands,” the
ministry spokesperson explained.
Who is behind the protest movements in de-facto canada Corporation and world wide protests?
Who is behind the movement against a SOLUTION.
We are dealing with a network of corporate funding of so-called “progressive” organizations.
This networking of funding dissent is a powerful instrument. It constitutes the basis whereby the economic elites retain control over the protest movement.
“Leaderless Movement”: or were they controlled Movements! Occupy - Idle No More, and many more failed Why? Why they FAILED NO SOLUTION
The group behind the event in de-facto unlawful Canada INC calls itself a
"Leaderless Movement " that doesn't take political sides, and says it is
mostly concerned with being forced to comply with the measures.
"We
are not anti-mask at all, we are pro-liberty," said Kelly Anne Wolfe,
the executive director of The Line Canada, a group that organized the
protest. "If you want to wear a mask or a tutu, we have nothing to say
about that. That is your right. You do not have a right to put one on my
face or the face of my children. It's as simple as that."
If your part of this group then start EDUCATING Constitutional Conventions and have your info of http://unifythepeople.ca/ to become part of the solution on creating a True Constitution.
How To Tell If Someone Is Controlled Opposition
Here is my answer: I don’t.
There’s no way to know for sure if an individual is secretly scheming to sheep dog the populace into support for the status quo, and as long as government agencies remain opaque and unaccountable there will never be a way to know who might be secretly working for them. What I can know is (A) what I’ve learned about the world, (B) the ways the political/media class is lying about what I know about the world, and (C) when someone says something which highlights those lies. I therefore pay attention solely to the message, and look for real Solutions.
In other words, if someone says something which disrupts establishment narratives, I help elevate what they’re saying in that specific instance. I do this not because I know that the speaker is legit and uncorrupted, but because their message in that moment is worthy of elevation. You can navigate the entire political/media landscape in this way.
Since society is made of narrative and power ultimately rests in the hands of those who are able to control those narratives, it makes no sense to fixate on individuals and it makes perfect sense to focus on narrative. What narratives are being pushed by those in power? How are those narratives being disrupted, undermined and debunked by things that are being said by dissident voices? This is the most effective lens through which to view the battle against the Globalists which is crushing us all to death, not some childish fixation on who should or shouldn’t be our hero.
Have no heroes. Trust nobody but your own inner sense-maker. If someone says something that disrupts establishment narratives based on what you understand those narratives to be, go ahead and help throw what they’re saying into the gears of the machine.
You will find which ones are just pretending, and these conversations mimic precisely the exact kinds of debates you’ll see in marginalized political circles about who’s the real deal and who’s controlled opposition. But the truth is there’s no way to know with certainty what’s going on in someone else’s head, and the best thing to do is to concentrate on a Solution.
There’s no reason to worry about what journalists, activists and politicians are coming from a place of authenticity if you know yourself to be coming from a place of authenticity. As you learn more about the world and get better at distinguishing fact from narrative, you will get better and better at seeing the narrative matrix clearly, and you’ll come to see all the things that are being said about what’s going on in the world as weapons in the battle of narrative control. Pick up whatever weapons seem useful to you and use them in whatever ways they’ll be useful, without wasting energy concerning yourself with the individuals who created them. Call the bullshit what it is and use the truth for what it is.
All you can know is what’s useful for you. If you really find it useful to try and organize individual dissident figures into “hero” and “controlled opposition” boxes, if that genuinely helps you take apart the system that’s hurting us all, you’d know that better than I would. But if you find what I’m saying here useful, pick it up and add it to your toolbox.
Now what’s coming out of the Movement is, “We don’t need leaders; we are the leaders.” But in effect, any organization that challenges the Globalists UN Agenda 21, and wants to yield some form of concrete results, has to have a very solid organizational structure. You don’t go and fight against the Globalist, because the Globalists are organized. The Globalists is a whole structure: institutions, banks, insurance companies, linked up to intelligence, and then linked up to the the Vatican. So if you want to change the tide, you have to organize, and you have to organize in a very solid way. You have to have a SOLUTION.
You demand a system which is corrupt, MUST be replaced and reformed, you don’t ask the leaders to act on your behalf. That’s rule no. 1. If the Leaders of groups do not offer a Solution then you step up.
Those leaders have to be unseated because they are the problem. They are not the solution. And it’s no use presenting a shopping list of demands, and then submitting it to the Globalists or the unlawful corruptregime canada INC.
You just do it, asking them to step down is obtuse.
Globalists Supports many Groups and and egos are easily controlled by weak individuals.
Now, what troubles many of us working on a SOLUTION in this Movement is that there is a covert element with organizations such as Anonymous, Adbusters, End the Lock Down, Hugs over Masks, Canadian Revolution, and the List of many groups have no Direction or a Solution Why? Well you do your own research, as well as their main websites. Who is behind it? Who is financing it? We recall that immediately when the these Movements got going, that several prominent personalities came to the support of these groups. And these were people you see on live feeds promotingthemselves and how many viewers they have and never offering any SOLUTION, Why? . Now these people, from my standpoint, do not constitute the solution to the crisis, they are the cause. They are the actors behind this crisis. Sympathy for the Movement should be viewed with some suspicion. That’s the way I see it.
Lets Look at the History of Movements and connect the Dots
Now I should also mention another organization which is OTPOR!
OTPOR! was an organization involved in Serbia in the year 2000. It was not a pro-democracy organization, it was actually an organization which shunted the 2000 elections in which Kostunica, who was the runner-up together with Milosevic, would have won in any event. But they prevented the second round of elections from occurring. And they essentially established the conditions for regime change. That was a colored revolution.
Controlled Opposition: a strategy in which an individual, organization, or movement is covertly controlled or influenced by a 3rd party and the controlled entity’s true purpose is something other than its publicly stated purpose. The controlled entity serves a role of mass deception, surveillance or political/social manipulation. The controlled party is portrayed as being in opposition to the interests of the controlling party.
The purposes of controlled opposition include: • Coopting or preempting a resistance movement to neutralize the threat that a grassroots movement would pose to an established power structure
• Preempt or neutralize true but negative information by having it be championed in a skewed or stigmatized fashion by a person or group. The truth can be peppered with misinformation or the truth of the message can be neutralized by association due to the extreme, radical, or unpalatable positions held by the controlled entity (person or group) who is disclosing the information or “championing” a position. The stigmatize truth or adulterated truth in turn steers people away from truthful information which would normally cause criticism or a serious backlash against the controlling party
• Hijack the goals and actions of an organization or movement for purposes other than those that were the original intentions of the grassroots movement
• Give the public the false illusion of choice by presenting a political party or organization that superficially speaks to the desires or frustrations of the people but whose actions do not further the stated goals of the organization
• Disinformation or deception of the masses. Steering the masses in the wrong direction or misdirect their energies, beliefs and actions
• Unmask and monitor the true opposition
• Create a chaotic and divisive environment in which the opposition cannot band together and there is general mistrust thereby ensuring that an organized opposition with clear goals and priorities never manifests
• Act in such a way that superficially appears to benefit the opposition, but in truth furthers the ends of the controlling party
The strategy of controlled opposition works best under circumstances in which the masses are gullible, credulous, lack critical thinking and are unable to connect the dots and see how the actions/inaction or manipulation of information from the controlled entity benefit the controlling entity.
This interview was first published in November 2011. It focussed on the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street, both of which were funded by corporate foundations.
We are dealing with a network of corporate funding of so-called “progressive” organizations.
This networking of funding dissent is a powerful instrument. It constitutes the basis whereby the economic elites retain control over the protest movement.
The Occupy Wall Street Movement as well as the World Social Forum were funded by the Globalist's.
You cannot organize a meaningful mass movement against the Empire and then ask the Empire to pay for your expenses.
And today Black Lives Matter has taken a firm stance in leading the campaign against Racism and Social Inequality.
Black Lives Matter, however, is generously funded by corporate charities and foundations ( Soros, Ford, et al) which are firmly committed to control the protest movement.
That has to be addressed.
It’s called “Manufactured Dissent”.
Michel Chossudovsky, May 1st 2016, updated June 2, 2020
* * *
[Potent News] We’re here with Michel Chossudovsky, and we’re having a little chat. I believe we were talking about, basically, the protests that are happening here that were started up by the Adbusters initially. I’ve got a couple of questions. Are you encouraged by what you see happening with the protests?
[Michel Chossudovsky] Well, I’m encouraged by the fact that people across the United States and Canada are rising up against an economic and political agenda. And they are the victims of the neo-liberal agenda. I’m not encouraged by the way this Occupy Wall Street movement is proceeding, because it was initiated by a couple of organizations: Adbusters, which is a magazine in Vancouver, and the other one was Anonymous, a social media hactivist website, which does not reveal its identity in any way.
I think the problem is that these promoters of the Occupy Wall Street movement have been actively planning a whole network of activities across America with social media, websites, and so on, for several months. In fact, the Occupy Wall Street website was launched back in, I think, in July [2011]. We don’t know who these people are. When we go to their websites, there’s no contact information. We don’t know who the leaders are. These are shadow leaders. [scroll down for complete transcript of interview]
Transcribed from the videos by Tara Carreon, American Buddha Online Librarian
[Potent News] We’re here with Michel Chossudovsky, and we’re having a little chat. I believe we were talking about, basically, the protests that are happening here that were started up by the Adbusters initially. I’ve got a couple of questions. Are you encouraged by what you see happening with the protests?
[Michel Chossudovsky] Well, I’m encouraged by the fact that people across the United States and Canada are rising up against an economic and political agenda. And they are the victims of the neo-liberal agenda. I’m not encouraged by the way this Occupy Wall Street movement is proceeding, because it was initiated by a couple of organizations: Adbusters, which is a magazine in Vancouver, and the other one was Anonymous, a social media hactivist website, which does not reveal its identity in any way. I think the problem is that these promoters of the Occupy Wall Street movement have been actively planning a whole network of activities across America with social media, websites, and so on, for several months. In fact, the Occupy Wall Street website was launched back in, I think, in July. We don’t know who these people are. When we go to their websites, there’s no contact information. We don’t know who the leaders are. These are shadow leaders.
“Leaderless Movement”: Occupy Wall Street WS Confronts “Organized Wall Street”
Now what’s coming out of the Movement is, “We don’t need leaders; we are the leaders.” But in effect, any organization that challenges Wall Street, and wants to yield some form of concrete results, has to have a very solid organizational structure. You don’t go and fight against Wall Street, because Wall Street is organized. Wall Street is a whole structure: institutions, banks, insurance companies, linked up to intelligence, and then linked up to the U.S. government. So if you want to change the tide, you have to organize, and you have to organize in a very solid way. You have to have a program.
Unseat the Leaders Who are NOT Supporting a Solution
You can’t just have a program that says, “Please Mr. Globalist, or the Parasites, or whoever happens to be in corrupt Regime, could you be more gentle, have less wars, could you tax the rich?” You don’t demand of a system which is in crisis, and should be replaced and reformed, you don’t ask the leaders to act on your behalf. That’s rule no. 1.
Those leaders have to be unseated because they are the problem. They are not the solution. And it’s no use presenting a shopping list of demands, and then submitting it to the Globalists.
Globalists Supports Globalists not the tax- slaves
Now, what troubles me in this Movement is that there is a covert element with organizations such as Anonymous, Adbusters, and many other groups protesting many issues, as well as their main websites. Who is behind it? Who is financing it? I recall that immediately when all these protests got going, that several prominent personalities came to the support these groups. Now these people, from my standpoint, do not constitute the solution to the crisis, they are the cause. They are the actors behind this crisis. sympathy for the Movement should be viewed with some suspicion. That’s the way I see it.
Now I should also mention another organization which is OTPOR!
OTPOR! was an organization involved in Serbia in the year 2000. It was not a pro-democracy organization, it was actually an organization which shunted the 2000 elections in which Kostunica, who was the runner-up together with Milosevic, would have won in any event. But they prevented the second round of elections from occurring. And they essentially established the conditions for regime change. That was a colored revolution.
And OTPOR! subsequently became a consulting firm, which is called CANVAS. It’s non-violent forms of action which were implemented in a large number of countries. CANVAS, it’s logo is the clenched fist. And they were involved in Georgia; they were involved in various former Soviet republics; they were involved in Iran; they were involved in Egypt, and in Tunisia. They’ve provided consulting to so-called revolutionary groups. But they are also backed by Freedom House and the National Endowment for Democracy, which are U.S. foundations closely allied both with the State Department on the one hand, the U.S. Congress, as well as U.S. Intelligence. So that in effect, CANVAS is really acting as a consulting arm of the U.S. Intelligence apparatus supporting a training program of CANVAS.
Any connection here we do Not Know - But do they offer a Solution
Free North Patriots - Look at the Designs of this - What do You See?
Meet the Strange and Mysterious Group Organizing Anti-Lockdown Protests Across Canada Free North Patriots
Now we know that the Egyptian leaders of the protest movement of the so-called Arab Spring, they were trained in Belgrade. They were trained by OTPOR! And it should come as no surprise that the clenched fist was used also in Egypt. And it was used in a number of countries. It’s of interest that the name of the resistance movement in Georgia was “Enough.” And in Egypt, the Kifaya movement, also in Arabic, means “Enough.” So that in fact, you find the same names, the same logos, the same catch phrases in several countries. And this is no coincidence, because CANVAS is operating as a professional consulting arm assisting the movements in various countries.
Now what this suggests is that this movement, at least the grassroots of this movement, who are committed people — we have to acknowledge that; these are people we should support, people in the street, people who are unemployed, students who can’t pay their tuition fees, people who are committed to social change — we must support them. But they are being manipulated by a framework which from the very outset is pernicious, because it’s based on links to the seat of power. In other words, if its linked to the National Endowment for Democracy, or to Freedom House, or to the CIA, it cannot have an independent stance in challenging the Globalist's.
And then the question is, “Who is funding this undertaking?” You cannot challenge the Globalists, and then ask the Globalists to pay for your travel expenses. And that is not something that is not limited to these events across de =-facto unlawful canada INC and around the planet. It’s something that has characterized progressive movements for a long, long time.
Trade unions have been infiltrated, their leaders invited to the World Economic Forum in Davos, then you also have other organizations such as those that joined the World Social Forum, or the People’s Summits. All those organizations are funded by tax-free foundations.
The World Social Forum
I’ve been looking into the World Social Forum, which was created some ten years ago. It started off in Brazil. And the World Social Forum was in effect funded by the Ford Foundation. Now we know that the Ford Foundation has links to the CIA. And many of the organizations didn’t realize that by being funded by the Ford Foundation, their hands were tied. The Ford Foundation would set the outer limits of dissent. And this is what I call “manufactured dissent.” It’s when the elites, through their tax-free foundations, will go in, and they will support limited forms of dissent which do not threaten their fundamental interest, which is the interest of making money and enriching themselves and so on.
So you have an expression of support to protests which is coming from various corners, and which is also supported by Establishment figures, and which is receiving a fair amount of media coverage. I recall events where you had mass rallies in Washington, D.C., and anti-war movements against the U.S. government, and there was a total media blackout. There was simply absolutely no coverage. And also in Egypt, there was coverage initially of the events at Tahrir Square when people were getting rid of Mubarak, but once they started mobilizing against the new regime, which in effect was Mubarak without Mubarak, because the same military establishment were calling the shots, well then the media simply didn’t cover those events.
Egypt and The Arab Spring
And what I also noticed in the case of Egypt was that at no time were the main organizations, which consisted of Kifaya, the April 6th movement, and the Muslim Brotherhood, at no time did they actually challenge the macro-economic reforms of the IMF and the World Bank, the neo-liberal agenda, which were imposed on Egypt starting in 1991 at the height of the Gulf War. And I so happened to be in Egypt at that very moment. I was in the Minister of Finance’s office. And that was imposed. And you had that whole period, over a period of 20 years, when the country was subject to these deadly macro-economic reforms, leading to the destruction of agriculture, and the massive unemployment in the public sector.
And that framework remains today. It hasn’t changed. In fact, it’s gotten worse, because in effect, in the wake of Tahrir Square, the Egyptian economy ran into certain difficulties, particularly with increased levels of external debt. And so the clenched fist of the IMF and the World Bank is still there. And the protest movement did not, from my standpoint, change the fundamental relationship which exists within Egyptian society, which is the whole state apparatus that is controlled by external creditors, as well as by the U.S. State Department and the U.S. Military. That we know.
So Tahrir Square cannot be presented as a model of pro-democracy protest, because essentially they have achieved virtually nothing. And they have achieved nothing precisely because the main groups — Kifaya, April 6 and Muslim Brotherhood — are controlled precisely by the U.S. Government. U.S. and British Intelligence in relation to the Muslim Brotherhood — that relationship is well established — and the links between the April 6th Youth Movement and the U.S. Embassy are well-documented. So you cannot run a revolution against the Empire — which is Washington — and then ask the Empire to give you money through its various foundations to fund your resistance against the Empire. It doesn’t make sense.
And the protests, rallies today is in a very similar situation. First of all, it is using Egypt and Tunisia as a model. They are not a model. They are failures. They are colored revolutions which have manipulated the grass roots, and which have led these countries into coup de sac, into a status quo. So the end game of the protest movement is the status quo. It’s a semblance of democratization, but in effect, what happens is that the people in power who are in positions of government are replaced by other people who are in effect playing the same role on behalf of the Globalist's. and the external creditors of those countries.
Now there was one thing which disturbed me in a statement by Occupy Wall Street. I recall that there was a statement by a number of personalities, including Naomi Klein, Noam Chomsky, and Vandana Shiva among others. And part of the statement was alright. But then they said they had to fight against “a global al-Assad, a global Gaddafi”, and that these dictators personified the IMF and the World Bank. They said the IMF and the World Bank are behind this agenda, and they are treating us in the same way Gaddafi and al-Assad are treating their people. Now that kind of comparison is totally misleading because it is demonizing the IMF and the World Bank through the image of a political personalities, rather than focusing on the IMF and the World Bank as economic demons in their own right. [In fact the objective of this misleading comparison is to demonize Assad and Gadaffi, M.Ch.]
[Potent News] A two-part question here. First, how can we keep this movement as pure as possible as opposed to a media spectacle that is coopted? And what would you advise for people whose hearts are in the right place, and want to make a difference?
Organized Protest. Confronting the Globalist's requires a Strong Organizational Structure
[Michel Chossudovsky] Well,I think a movement which is confronting the World Economic Order, the New Economic Order, has to be organized across the land not solely in terms of street events, it has to have an organizational structure in towns, and cities, and villages, and workplaces, and parishes, in universities and colleges. In other words, all the various entities of civil society. It also has to permeate mainstream organizations such as trade unions and human rights organizations. It has to have a very strong organizational structure which can confront the corporate agenda.Corporations are very well organized, but they still constitute a minority. Now if the 99% want to ultimately reverse the tide, they have to organize. They have to have strong leadership. They have to have a program. And they are not there to make demands. They are there to question the legitimacy of the corporate agenda. They are there to unseat these powerful actors whose legitimacy actually is sustained by a very crooked and fraudulent apparatus. So that’s what you have to tackle.
The Tobin Tax: Taming the Speculators
I recall many years ago when the World Social Forum started up, there was another movement which was called ATTAC, which was one of implanting a tax on speculative transactions. It was called the TOBIN tax. And everybody joined the bandwagon of the TOBIN tax. saying we have to put a tax on speculative activities, and use the proceeds of this tax to help the poor.
I was opposed to that for various reasons, but more fundamentally, if you want to get rid of highway robbery, you don’t put a tax on highway robbery. If you want to get rid of speculation, which is ultimately the instrument for transferring wealth, you do not provide legitimacy to the speculators by taxing him 1%, or whatever, of his transactions. You freeze those transactions. And that is something that can be achieved. In other words, their whole series of speculative instruments on Wall Street which affect, let’s say the price of food, the price of oil and which are impoverishing people worldwide.
Putting a Freeze on Derivative Trade
Now, how do you reverse the tide? You put a freeze on derivative trade. You don’t tax the speculator. The speculators were the first people to endorse the TOBIN tax. Why? Because they’re stealing from the 99% by using very complex financial instruments. And if a tax is imposed, the legitimacy of their undertakings is not questioned. They pay the 1% tax that is used to compensate the people who have been expropriated and impoverished as a result of their actions, and it provides a human face to the speculative onslaught. That is what is behind this complicity of Globalist controlled movement. You do not reverse the tide by taxing the rich. You have to tax the rich, but ultimately you have to address the broader question of how do these people enrich themselves at the expense of the 99%.
NATO Atrocities in Libya
[Potent News] So one last question. Apparently, yesterday at the conference at the university [St Mary’s University, Halifax] there, apparently was someone doing the video that was actually shedding light on what’s actually happening in Libya. I heard that one of the people there cried and walked out. How important do you think it is to be able to gain the strength to face what is being done in our world and often in our name?
[Michel Chossudovsky] Well, I think in Libya, atrocities have been committed by NATO. Thousands of people have been killed. The media is not reporting those atrocities. It has a responsibility as media, as journalists, to report the facts on the ground. But that is not happening. In fact, it’s the reverse: they are obfuscating. They are acting as a camouflage, as a cover-up. And they are providing a human face to the rebels, which are in large part are made up of al-Qaeda militia. This is not a pro-democracy movement. And what has happened is that the media has supportedthis war.
NATO: “We are running out of bombs”
COVID -19 -- PLANDEMIC
Without the media, they could not have run this war, because they would not have been able to camouflage the impacts of those bombings. Anyone who has a minimal understanding of fighter aircraft knows that if you have 10,000 strike sorties, with a dozen missiles on each of these fighter planes, you’re going to kill a lot of people. You’re talking above 50,000 bombs. And it’s certainly worth noting that already in the month of April [20111], after one month of bombing, NATO has said, “We’re running out of bombs.” They’re running out of bombs?! That’s an incredible observation against a country of 6 million people. And then they would make the same statement, “We haven’t killed anybody.”
So people don’t analyze necessarily that data which comes out from NATO. Every week they will publish the number of strike sorties. But the military analysts working for the mainstream media, who know the planes, who have an understanding of war, and of the impacts of advanced weapon systems, they have a responsibility to report those, to analyze them. They are not doing it.
Killing Gaddafi. Destroying an Entire Country
And yes, atrocities are being committed. But what I find disturbs me is that when you go to Occupy Wall Street, they say we must implement pro-democracy following the example of our brothers and sisters in Libya. And they are referring to the transitional counsel which is made up of a bunch of criminals, and which does not represent the Libyan population. And then they present Gaddafi as the enemy of democracy.
Now with facts about Gaddafi, Gaddafi is not the enemy of liberty and freedom, it’s the Globalists , which in the course of the last 100 years or thousand of years has supported dictatorships all over the world. And now they say we’re pro-democracy. The fact is, if they don’t like a particular head of state, or head of government in the case of Gaddafi, they go in and they kill him, and they kill the members of his family, and his grandchildren. And that is not the way you implement liberty. You implement liberty by respecting the sovereignty of countries, and the rights of people in those countries to decide on how they want to run their own affairs.
Libya Had the Highest Standard of Living in Africa
And I think it’s important for the record that Libya was one of very few countries in the world that did not obey the Globalists of Washington and the IMF. , confirm that the standard of living in Libya is the highest in Africa. There’s full employment, there’s almost 100% literacy, 50% of students who graduate from high school go to university, and it is by African standards an advanced welfare state. Whether we like the political regime or not, we have to acknowledge that.
The mass Protests must Provide a Solution to End Globalization
And so the protests has to take a stance not only against the issues but provide a Solution, On how to fix the Problems, with a constitutional Conventions, what is a constitution , why will it do for the sovereigns. The Power of a Constitution is what terrifies the Globalists, it will end their unlawful Regime.
We always been played by the Globalists - COVID just another Globalist's UN Agenda 21
And then we discover that in Syria, the gunmen involved in the confrontation with the government forces are paid mercenaries who are Selafists, al-Qaeda-affiliated, and they are also supported by Western Intelligence. And this is an insurgency which purports to destabilize a sovereign country. Whether we like al-Assad or not, I respect the right of the Syrian people to decide on their own future without the intrusion of armed gunmen paid by foreign powers. And that is what is happened.
And the propaganda media also has the responsibility of reporting what’s going on in Syria. And when they have protesters armed with heavy machine guns, they have the responsibility to acknowledge that; because that’s not a protest movement, that’s an insurgency.
Follow the Money
The Occupy Wall Street Movement (OWS) was launched by Adbusters, a Vancouver based NGO.
Adbusters is funded by the Tides Foundation. The latter is in turn funded by a large number of corporate foundations and charities, including the Ford Foundation, Gates Foundation and the Open Society Institute. Ford is known to have links to US intelligence.
While Tides makes its name by facilitating large pass-through grants to outside groups, many of Tides’ grantees are essentially activist startups. Part of Tides’ overall plan is to provide day-to-day assistance to the younger groups that it “incubates.
Globalists foundations support the protest movement against themselves? How convenient.
Globalism Cannot hijack a Sovereign Constitution
The Globalist's use a fake Constitution that gives them all the Power So Be Part of the Solution Creating a Constitution that Places the Sovereigns into Power
Imagine that, accountability, future, Prosperity, Land and Property
